- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
供应链系统库存管理
Risk Pooling Centralized
inventory control
1
(1 )与不确定性需求有关的几条原则
(2 )风险分担的案例
(3 )集中系统与分散系统的库存比较
(4 )集中系统与分散系统的权衡
2
(1 )与不确定性需求有关的几条原则
• Aggregated(汇聚的) forecast is more accurate
• Demand variability is reduced if one aggregates
demand across locations.
- High demand from one customer may be offset by
low demand from another.
• Reduction in variability allows a decrease in safety
stock and therefore reduces average inventory.
ss Z üStandard deviation,
L
üCoefficient of variation, cv = /
3
(2) ACME: Risk Pooling Case
• Electronic equipment manufacturer and
distributor
• 2 warehouses for distribution in Massachusetts
and New Jersey (partitioning the northeast
market into two regions)
• Each retailer (Customer) is assigned to a single
market (warehouse)
• Warehouses receive materials from Chicago
• Current rule: 97 % service level
(3 % probability of stock-out)
4
lCurrent distribution systems:
Warehouse One Market One
Massachusetts
Supplier
•Chicago
Warehouse Two Market Two
New Jersey
Problems:
- over 7 years ago
-1,500 products
-10,000 customers in Northeast.
Considering an alternative logistics strategy
l New Idea
• Replace the 2 warehouses with a single warehouse
• The same service level 97 %
• Delivery lead times may increase
• But may
原创力文档


文档评论(0)