4.8 风险分担与集中式库存控制.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
供应链系统库存管理 Risk Pooling Centralized inventory control 1 (1 )与不确定性需求有关的几条原则 (2 )风险分担的案例 (3 )集中系统与分散系统的库存比较 (4 )集中系统与分散系统的权衡 2 (1 )与不确定性需求有关的几条原则 • Aggregated(汇聚的) forecast is more accurate • Demand variability is reduced if one aggregates demand across locations. - High demand from one customer may be offset by low demand from another. • Reduction in variability allows a decrease in safety stock and therefore reduces average inventory. ss Z  üStandard deviation,   L üCoefficient of variation, cv =  / 3 (2) ACME: Risk Pooling Case • Electronic equipment manufacturer and distributor • 2 warehouses for distribution in Massachusetts and New Jersey (partitioning the northeast market into two regions) • Each retailer (Customer) is assigned to a single market (warehouse) • Warehouses receive materials from Chicago • Current rule: 97 % service level (3 % probability of stock-out) 4 lCurrent distribution systems: Warehouse One Market One Massachusetts Supplier •Chicago Warehouse Two Market Two New Jersey Problems: - over 7 years ago -1,500 products -10,000 customers in Northeast. Considering an alternative logistics strategy l New Idea • Replace the 2 warehouses with a single warehouse • The same service level 97 % • Delivery lead times may increase • But may

文档评论(0)

恬淡虚无 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

学高为师,身正为范.师者,传道授业解惑也。做一个有理想,有道德,有思想,有文化,有信念的人。 学无止境:活到老,学到老!有缘学习更多关注桃报:奉献教育,点店铺。

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档