- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
(完整版)一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板(可编辑修改word版)
一些英文审稿看法的模板最近在审一篇英文稿,第一次做这个工作,还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿,我想不会枪毙它的,给他一个 major revision 后接收吧。呵呵网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++1、目的和结果不清楚。It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未说明讨论方法或说明不充分。In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.3、对于讨论设计的 rationale:Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.4、夸大地陈述结论/夸张成果/不严谨:The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对 hypothesis 的清楚界定:A hypothesis needs to be presented。6、对某个概念或工具用法的 rationale/定义概念:What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?7、对讨论问题的定义:Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,write one section to define the problem8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写 literature review:The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.9、对 claim,如 A>B 的证明,verification:There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.10、严谨度问题:MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.11、格式〔重视程度〕:In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with Instructions for Authors which shows examples.Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the Instructions and Forms button in he upper right-hand corner of the sc
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2025年AI在企业人力资源中的应用白皮书2.0 -智、效双驱: 赋新质、创新生.pdf VIP
- CRL-H户用超声热量表-汇中仪表.pdf VIP
- 第二语言习得02 相关领域与研究传统 PPT课件.pptx VIP
- 人工智能的利与弊最新完整版本.pptx VIP
- CRTAS-2024-05 互联网租赁自行车运营服务规范.docx
- 姑溪河当涂闸枢纽工程环境影响报告书.pdf VIP
- 项目管理人员安全培训课件.pptx VIP
- 【2024版】普通话水平测试用朗读作品 50 篇带拼音版.pdf VIP
- 第二语言习得03 早期研究 PPT课件.pptx VIP
- 汽车行业质量管理体系IATF16949认证审核及评审清单(内审员、外审员、过程审核员如何开展审核?).pdf VIP
原创力文档


文档评论(0)