资料参考说明分析igip brazil.pptxVIP

AIESEC MoC oGIP Brazil - iGIP MoC ANALYZES National Control Board AUG`13 – AUG`14 The minus comes from complete NPSwhich is about co-delivery and ICX side. More clear expectation setting needs to happen from OGX side, for ICX side we need to pay more attention for delivery process. The response rate is not so high. From Brazil side: will be better to put NPS education into EP induction. From MoC side: we need to put information in TN form and during induction process. PROMOTERS Top issues Matched stage Realized stage Complete stage The selection process 24.3 intergration by the hosting entity 22.5 no data on CG The selection panel/interview 12.7 Integration into the local culture 6.8 Communication and clarity around the process 12.7 Integration into the local chapter 6.8 Information provided about the GIP programme 13.9 logistical support 12.5 Programme benefits explanation 2.2 Introduction to the organisation/project 12.3 Objectives of the programme 2.2 Pick-up 1.2 Communication effectivity during acceptance procedure 13.9 Cultural preparation 2.5 Communication by the Home LC 6 Cultural preparation meeting or event 1.2 Information about the acceptance process 6 Resource/contact sharing for cultural preparation 1.2 Matched stage Realized stage Complete stage Visa documents and information 0 Job-description clarity and alignment -10 AIESEC’ support during the experience -62.5 information about the exchange conditions 0 Job-description aligned with the TN form -5.6 Support by host entity during the experience -31.5 Visa documents processing time 0 Job-description clarity -5.6 -31.3 Information about the visa process 0 Support by home entity during the experience Matching support 0 Professional Development through this experience -12.5 Matching tools and emails training 0 ncreased personal network -6.3 Matching process explanation 0 Language knowledge -6.3 Communication effectivity during acceptance procedure 0 Professional working environment -12.5 Com