无机胶结材料植筋粘结锚固性能试验研究的中期报告.docxVIP

无机胶结材料植筋粘结锚固性能试验研究的中期报告 摘要： 本研究旨在研究不同类型胶结材料植筋粘结锚固性能，为工程实践提供可靠数据，为无机胶结材料植筋的理论与应用提供理论支持。 本试验采用常规拉拔试验和剪切试验分别测试了3种不同类型的无机胶结材料（水泥基胶结材料、二氧化硅基胶结材料和铝酸盐基胶结材料）与钢筋植筋的粘结锚固性能。结果表明，在常规工程应用中，水泥基胶结材料在拉拔和剪切试验中表现最优。但是，铝酸盐基胶结材料在剪切试验中也表现出很好的锚固性能，优于水泥基胶结材料。 同时，对比了不同类型无机胶结材料在植筋过程中的应力分布情况。通过数学模拟和试验验证，发现水泥基胶结材料稳定性较好，且植筋固化时间较短，因此应用广泛。但是，在特定的工程应用中，如高压水泥灌浆注浆等情况下，二氧化硅基胶结材料和铝酸盐基胶结材料也有广泛的应用前景。 关键词：无机胶结材料；植筋；粘结锚固性能；应力分布 Abstract: The objective of this study is to investigate the bond anchorage properties of different types of inorganic bonding materials for rebar anchoring, and to provide reliable data for practical engineering while offering theoretical support for the theory and application of inorganic bonding materials for rebar anchoring. In this experiment, three types of inorganic bonding materials (cement-based bonding material, silica-based bonding material, and aluminate-based bonding material) were tested for their bond anchorage properties with steel bars in conventional tensile and shear tests. The results showed that in conventional engineering applications, cement-based bonding material performed the best in both tensile and shear tests. However, aluminate-based bonding material also exhibited very good bond anchorage properties in the shear test and outperformed cement-based bonding material. Meanwhile, the stress distribution of different types of inorganic bonding materials during the rebar anchoring process was compared. Through mathematical simulations and experimental verification, it was found that cement-based bonding materials have good stability and a shorter curing time, making them widely used. However, in specific engineering applications such as high pressure cement grouting, silica-based bonding materials and aluminate-based bonding materials also have a wide range of applications. Keywords: inorganic bonding materials; rebar anchoring; bond anchorage properties; stress distribution