模块不合情理行为公平条款必需读数教科书chs 7module 7 lecture slides3讲座.pptx

下载文档

0
0
约1.51万字
约 41页
2025-02-27 发布于北京
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

模块不合情理行为公平条款必需读数教科书chs 7module 7 lecture slides3讲座.pptx

1、本文档共41页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Module7:UnconscionableConductandUnfairContractTermsRequiredReadings:TextbookChs5-7,mendedReading:Corones,chs5and6

LearningesThismodulewillenableyoutounderstandTheACLprovisionsonunconscionableconduct,andhowtheconceptappliestoprotectconsumersandbusiness;andTheACLprovisionsonunfaircontracttermsthatapplytoastandardformcontractConsequencesofthebreach

UnconscionableconductUnconscionableconduct–unwrittenlaw?s20oftheACLStatutoryunconscionableconduct?s21oftheACLNewInterpretatives22toaidthecourtintheinterpretationofs21Theconceptofunconscionableconductins21iswiderinscopethanitisins20oftheACL

Unconscionableconductwithinthemeaningoftheunwrittenlaw–ACLs20s20(1) Apersonmustnot,intradeorcommerce,engageinconductthatisunconscionable,withinthemeaningoftheunwrittenlawfromtimetotime. (2) Thissectiondoesnotapplytoconductthatisprohibitedbysection?21

Whatismeantby‘unwrittenlawfromtimetotime’?TheExplanatoryMemorandumstates:ArrayofcommonlawandequitableprinciplesthathavebeendevelopedintheAustraliancourtsovermanyyearsontheconceptofunconscionableconductPreviousjurisprudencedevelopedinthecourtsofEnglandandWalespriortotheindependenceoftheAustralianjudicialsystemDecisionsofthePrivyCouncilexercisingitsnowendedappellatejurisdictionoverStatecourts

HowtodeterminewhetheraconductisunconscionableCommercialBankofAustraliavAmadio(1983)151CLRClassiccaseonunconscionableconductinAustralia

Threequestionstobeasked:

Isoneofthepartiestothecontractatspecialdisadvantagebycomparisontotheotherparty,suchthatthespecialdisadvantagecreatesareasonabledegreeofinequalitybetweenthem?Isthestrongerpartyawareofthespecialdisadvantage?Isitunfairorunconscientiousofthestrongerparty,knowingofthisspecialdisadvantage,toenterthecon