连接缓冲管理和行程安排 forDifferentiated 服务.pd

连接缓冲管理和行程安排 forDifferentiated 服务.pd

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
JoBS: Joint Buffer Management and Scheduling for Differentiated Services? J¨ org Liebeherr and Nicolas Christin Computer Science Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA fjorg, nicolasg@ Abstract. A novel algorithm for buffer management and packet scheduling is presented for providing loss and delay differentiation for traf?c classes at a net- work router. The algorithm, called JoBS (Joint Buffer Management and Schedul- ing), provides delay and loss differentiation independently at each node, without assuming admission control or policing. The novel capabilities of the proposed algorithm are that (1) scheduling and buffer management decisions are performed in a single step, and (2) both relative and (whenever possible) absolute QoS re- quirements of classes are supported. Numerical simulation examples, including results for a heuristic approximation, are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach and to compare the new algorithm to existing methods for loss and delay differentiation. 1 Introduction Quality-of-Service (QoS) guarantees in packet networks are often classi?ed according to two criteria. The ?rst criterion is whether guarantees are expressed for individual end-to-end traf?c ?ows (per-?ow QoS) or for groups of ?ows with the same QoS re- quirements (per-class QoS). The second criterion is whether guarantees are expressed with reference to guarantees given to other ?ows/?ow classes (relative QoS), or whether guarantees are expressed as absolute bounds (absolute QoS). Efforts to provision for QoS in the Internet in the early and mid-1990s, which re- sulted in the Integrated Services (IntServ) service model [3], focused on per-?ow ab- solute QoS guarantees. However, due to scalability issues and a lagging demand for per-?ow absolute QoS, the interest in Internet QoS eventually shifted to relative per- class guarantees. Since late 1997, the Differentiated Services (DiffServ) [2] working group has discussed several propos

文档评论(0)

山丹丹 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档