- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: here to stay?
European perspectives
Kathleen Kiernan
London School of Economics and Political Science
Conference on Public Policy and the Future of the Family
th
October 25 2002
Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood: here to stay?
European perspectives
Introduction
In many Western European nations few developments in family life have been quite
as dramatic as the recent rises in unmarried cohabitation and having children outside
of marriage. These developments raise questions about the hegemony of legal
marriage as the basis of family life and many of the assumptions on which public
policies are built.
Although cohabitation is often regarded as a recent development it includes a range of
living arrangements some of which are novel whilst others are more traditional. Prior
to the 1970s, cohabiting unions were largely statistically invisible, and may well have
been socially invisible outside of the local community or milieu. In some European
countries there were sub-groups of the population who were more prone to
cohabitation than others: the poor; those whose marriages had broken-up but were
unable to obtain a divorce; certain groups of rural dwellers; and groups who were
ideologically opposed to marriage.
Although there are few statistical data on how common cohabitation was in the past
there is evidence from parish register data for Britain, that stable, non-marital
procreative unions in earlier periods, going back several centuries, often attained the
status of legal marriage (Laslett et al). Moreover, cohabitation after a marriage breaks
down and between marriages is unlikely to be a recent development as common sense
alone would suggest that in periods when divorces were less easy to obtain people
might well choose to cohabit. Charles Booth in his studies of the labouring
population in London noted that those who were most likely to be cohabiting were
older formerly m
原创力文档


文档评论(0)