国际政治博士点专业文献20070125.docVIP

中国人民大学国际政治研究生专业主文献目录表 论 文 Donald Kagan, “In Defense of History” (2005 Jefferson Lecture in the Humanities, Yale University, May 12, 2005) John Lewis Gaddis, “History, Science, and the Study of International Relations,” in Ngaire Woods, ed., Explaining International Relations since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 32-47; Leopold von Ranke, “The Great Powers,” in idem, The Theory and Practice of History, edited by Georg Iggers and Konrad von Moltke (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1973), pp. 65-101; Ludwig Dehio, “The Passing of the European System,” in idem, Germany and World Politics in the Twentieth Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1959), pp. 124-133; Paul Kennedy, “Mahan vs. Mackinder: Two Interpretations of the British Sea Power,” in Paul Kennedy, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870-1945: Eight Studies (London: George Allen Unwin, 1983), pp. 43-85; John Lewis Gaddis, “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System，” in idem, The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 215-245; Martin Wight, “Why Is There No International Theory?” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 17-34; Steven Forde, “Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (May 1992), pp. 372-393; Hedley Bull, “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigations (Cambridge, Mass., 1966), pp. 51-73; J.L. Brierly, “The Classical Writers on International Law,” in idem, The Law of Nations, 6th edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963), pp. 25-40; Michael W. Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Fall 1983)； Hedley Bull, “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” World Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3