民事责任能力论文自然人民事责任能力研究.docVIP

民事责任能力论文：自然人民事责任能力研究 【中文摘要】未成年人和精神病患者作为精神耗弱者,在造成他人损害时,应该由其本人承担赔偿责任,还是由其监护人承担赔偿责任,或者二者承担连带责任,是自然人民事责任能力所研究的重要领域。各国针对自然人责任能力制度采用了不同的标准,主要有识别主义、出生主义和行为能力主义三种模式。我国采用了行为能力主义标准,其不足之处显而易见。为了更好的保护精神耗弱者,同时考虑受害人的利益保护,笔者通过分析比较我国相关规定与其他一些国家相关规定的异同,尝试对我国的自然人民事责任能力制度提出一些结论性建议。本文分为四个部分:第一部分通过分析比较三个案例及其判决,发现我国相关规定的不足并提出问题,引出本文讨论的主体。第二部分对自然人民事责任能力的概念与内涵予以分析,并把责任能力与相关概念对比区分,以更好的界定自然人责任能力的本质。第三部分是对责任能力判断标准的比较分析,充分考察了一些国家所采取的责任能力标准,并分析其异同,找出一个较好的责任能力标准模式。第四部分主要针对我国现行规定的不足,通过七个小段对该制度分析论证,最后提出对该制度的尝试设计。 【英文摘要】Minors and psychopaths as spirit in its weak, consuming cause damage to others, should be liable by himself, or his guardian liable, or both jointly and severally liable, are the important aspect of the study on civil liability capacity of natural person. Countries in civil liability capacity of natural person system use different standards, basically have three models: recognition doctrine, birth doctrine and behavior ability doctrine. our country uses the behavior ability doctrine standard ,but its deficiency is obvious. In order to better protect the people as spirit in its weak , and consider protecting the interests of the victim, and analyse and compare the similarities and differences with other relevant provisions between our country and others, tries to put forward some conclusive suggestion about civil liability ability of natural persons.This paper is divided into four parts: the first part by the analysis and comparison of three cases and its verdict, finds the the shortage of relevant regulation and ask questions, leads to the subject discussed in this paper. The second part is the analysis of the concept and connotation about the civil liability capacity of natural persons ,and the comparison with related concepts to better define the essence of the civil liability capacity of natural persons. The third part is the comparative analysis about the judgment standard of civil liability capacity. Fully investigates civil liability capacity standards that some countries take