权利正当性证明新路径——以合约为理论框架.pdfVIP

权利正当性证明的新路径——以合约为理论框架 中文摘要 权利正当性证明的新路径——以合约为理论框架 中文摘要 权利之所以难以下定义，是因为权利没有本体，对权利的分析便转向于对权利的 正当性证明。“A 拥有一项权利”可以作为分析权利问题的一个合适出发点。对于权 利这个事物的探寻，现行学者分别从不同的理论模式对权利展开了分析，由此形成了 抽象权利、具体权利以及真正权利三种权利形态。然而，诸种权利传统分析模式皆出 现种种困难和问题，原因在于分析者没有意识到权利这个正当事物所具有的规范性特 质，他们不自觉地以事实性的语言侵蚀甚至替换了权利所表征的正当性内涵，同时他 们对于权利实践中问题的认识也存在偏差。合约这个概念的属性以及权利这个事物不 完全界定的特征，使得合约可以成为分析权利问题的一个合适理论框架。当然，用合 约分析权利问题也并非是完美无缺的。 关键词：权利；正当；合约；互惠 作 者：张洪新 指导老师：周永坤 I 英文摘要 权利正当性证明的新路径——以合约为理论框架 A New way of the justification of the Rights ——contract as a framework Abstract The reason why a right is difficult to define is that the rights have no ontology, so the analysis of the rights resorts to the justification of it .From my own part, ―A has a right‖ could be considered as a suit point to explain the problems of rights, however we also must have in mind that the rights is normality, and any legal analysis of rights should be a process of value-oriented. If normality is ignored, an analysis must be problematic. There are many theoretical models to analysis rights, however, the reason of what they more or less confront to paradox and dilemma is that they not only both use factual things corrupt, or even supplant the moral values that the rights desire to convey, but also have a misunderstanding of the problem of the rights. By ways of attributing the human dignity to the normative values that the rights desire to convey, a new perspective may be bright to us for the analysis of rights, i.e. contractual framework. For one thing, cont