- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
《ladder-of-citizen-participation_en》.pdf
A Ladder of Citizen Participation - Sherry R Arnstein
Originally published as Arnstein, Sherry R. A Ladder of Citizen Participation, JA P, Vol. 35,
No. 4, July 1969, pp. 216-224. do not claim any copyrights.
Webmasters comment, November 2004.
The following article is quite old, but
never-the-less of great value to anyone
interested in issues of citizen participation.
The concepts discussed in this article about
1960s America are still mostly unknown
by people around the world. Many
planners, architects, politicians, bosses,
proj ect leaders and power-holder still dress
all variety of manipulations up as
participation in the process, citizen
consultation and other shades of
technobable.
This article was reprinted in The City
Reader (second edition) edited by Richard
T. Gates and Frederic Stout, 1996,
Routledge Press. Their editors introduction
is well worth reading.
Please copy and re-distribute this article.
Lets work to help people understand the
difference between citizen control and
manipulation. f youre reading this then
assume you are interested in empowering
people to take charge of their lives and
their surrounding. salute you for this
work.
Enjoy.
1. Citizen participation is Figure 1. French student p oster. In English, I participate, y ou
citizen power pa rticipate, he participates, we p articipate, you p articipate...they
p rofit.
Because the question has been a bone of political contention, most of the answers have been purposely
buried in innocuous euphemisms like self-help or citizen involvement. Still others have been
embellished with misleading r
文档评论(0)