《【推荐研究生阅读之1】How+to+pulish+a+(good)+Paper_SCYan》.ppt

《【推荐研究生阅读之1】How+to+pulish+a+(good)+Paper_SCYan》.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
摘自Yaqing Zhang的讲座 颜水成 2004.5.27 提纲 什么时候开始写? 什么是一篇好文章? 如何让一篇好文章发表? When to write a paper? Passion with your invention/concept Compelled to speak and write Truly novel concept/algorithm/procedure/architecture Vision and survey that provide value for the community Solid and mature results What is a Good Paper ? Well-Defined Problem Simple and Compelling Clear Contributions Reliable and Reproducible Results Good structure and logic flow Frequent Referrals A few misconceptions The more, the better Many new ideas The more selling, the better First-ever, the best, breakthrough The more authoritative, the better Excessive use of own references and previous work How to Publishing a Paper Before Submissions – Choose a journal or conference Journals - for formal evaluation Conferences - for quick presentation and interaction After Submissions – Communicate with Reviewers/Editors Reviewers’ comments Revisions Handling rejections Before Submissions – choose the right publications Review Process 1: Submit your paper to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) 2: EIC assigns a responsible Associate Editor (AE) 3: AE identifies 3-5 anonymous reviewers 4: AE makes a preliminary decision based on the comments 3-6Mon Acceptance (w/o or w/ minor revisions) Major revisions ( = Step 3) Rejection 5: AE makes final recommendation to EIC regarding the status of the paper 6: EIC makes the final decision and inform the author 7: Author then works with the Publication Editor (PE) to get the paper published Rebuttal When You submit a rebuttal Point-by-point detailed response to each reviewer Constructive and positive Clear and to-the-point Responsive ( 1 month) It’s fine to disagree with the reviewers, AE may be on your side If there are many disagreements, exchange emails w/ AE in advance, to minimize the # of rounds You need to make some compromise, but not on principles It’s your paper ! Reviewers carefully read my paper [T][F] [F] A review typically makes up his/her mi

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

ghfa + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档