《纽约律考 Alien Notes NY bar Constitutional Law RBK》.doc

《纽约律考 Alien Notes NY bar Constitutional Law RBK》.doc

  1. 1、本文档共60页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
《纽约律考 Alien Notes NY bar Constitutional Law RBK》.doc

NEW YORK COURSE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Professor Erwin Chemerinsky This subject is usually not tested in the NY part, and when it does only regarding the 1st Amendment. OVERVIEW OF ORGANIZATION THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL POWER (15% of the constitutional law questions) THE FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE POWER THE FEDERAL EXECUTIVE POWER (II & III together: 20% of the constitutional law questions) FEDERALISM (20% of the constitutional law questions) THE STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION’S PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES DUE PROCESS EQUAL PROTECTION (V-VII together: 25% of the constitutional law questions) VIII. FIRST AMENDMENT (20% of the constitutional law questions) I. THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL POWER A. The requirement for cases and controversies There are 4 juscitciability requirements for Federal courts to acquire jurisdiction: 1. Standing. This is the most important requirement (consisting of 2-3 questions). Standing is the question of whether the plaintiff is the proper party to bring a matter to the court for adjudication. a. Injury. i. Plaintiffs only may assert injuries that they personally have suffered. Sierra Club v. Morton (complaint didn't allege personal injury and was dismissed). If a question asks which plaintiff has the best standing, first look which one suffered personal injury; if more than one then look for the one whose personal injury is economic. ii. Plaintiffs seeking injunctive or declaratory relief must show a likelihood of future harm. City of Los Angels v. Lyons (plaintiff, a felon chocked during his investigation petitioned against chocking suspects. Court held he didn't show that he's likely to be chocked again in the future). b. Causation and redressability. The plaintiff must allege and prove that the defendant caused the injury so that a favorable court decision is likely to redress the injury. The reason being that Article III was designed to prevent Federal courts from giving advisory opinions. No third party standing. A plaintiff canno

文档评论(0)

cnsg + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档