- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
的、务实的方案。在具体的立法技术上,相比于旧罪改造可能带来的牵一发而动全身的诸多
弊端,另设新罪更具可操作性。具体而言,应当在《刑法》第 273 条“挪用特定款物罪”之
下增设“第 273 条之一”,即单位非法套取、挪用、侵吞国家专项资金罪对该类犯罪行为予
以法律规制。
关键词:单位犯罪;非法套取、挪用、侵吞;国家专项资金;罪刑法定原则
2
Abstract
Countries have set up special funds aimed at effectively relieve strained local finances, and
constantly improve peoples livelihood facilities, and actively promote the results of the reform of
social sharing. Logically, according to the relevant units and individuals shall be properly
managed to ensure that earmarking . However, the fact has repeatedly shown that these should
serve the peoples livelihood in this field of construction of special funds are increasingly being
eroded some units and individuals crazy , thus adversely affecting the national special fund
fulfilling its functions , serious damage to peoples fundamental interests. For such a serious
violation of the countrys financial management system, endangering national security special
fund criminal acts , should strengthen the judicial disciplinary efforts. But confusing is that , in
relation to the illegal taking , embezzlement , misappropriation of state special funds of crime , we
often see is the units involved , rarely heard by the criminal liability related units . Well, the
reasons behind what is ? Is a legislative oversight , judicial helplessness , or inadequate theoretical
research ? Furthermore, we should take measures to improve how to close the French Open , to
curb the further spread of such crimes ? With the above problems, this paper intends to obtain
from the judicial practice , a typical case is cut through the qualitative differences between the
cases discussed , showing the unit illegally taking , embezzlement , misappropriation of state
special funds to conduct an objective existence in practice judicial confusion , then explore and
analyze their causes, and on this basis to propose a preliminary solution or perfect views .
This paper is divided into five parts, a total of about 25,000 words.
Article
文档评论(0)