驰名商标司法认定的异化回归.docVIP

河 北 工 业 大 学 毕 业 论 文 ? ? 作 者： 赵凌 学 号： / 学 院： 人文与法律学院 系(专业)： 法学 题 目： 驰名商标司法认定的异化与回归 ? 指导者： 刘期家 讲师 评阅者： 马兵 讲师 ? ? 2012年5月30日 ? 毕业论文中文摘要 驰名商标司法认定的异化与回归 摘要： 自2001年我国确立了驰名商标的司法认定制度以来，驰名商标的司法认定一方面起到了保护商标权人合法权益、维护商标法律秩序的作用；另一方面，由于驰名商标的司法认定具有简易性，标准极易达到，也因而被许多不择手段追逐利益最大化的商家所利用，驰名商标的司法认定出现偏离正常轨道的异化现象。由于驰名商标司法认定制度具有缺陷，通过司法途径骗取驰名商标的路径现实存在。商标侵权之诉适用的自认制度与法官在诉讼中消极中立的地位，使虚假诉讼的制造有机可乘。而诉讼欺诈的责任缺失却使虚假诉讼的违法成本几乎为零。2009年最高人民法院关于驰名商标的解释 异化 回归 ? ? ?毕业论文外文摘要 ? Title The Dissimilation and Return of The Well-known Trademark Judicial Determination Abstract Since 2001, judicial determination system of well-known trademarks established in China. As a result, the system has protected the rights of the owner of the trademarks and played the role of maintaining the order of trademark legal system. The phenomenon of dissimilation appears to the judicial determination of well-known trademarks for the following reasons: first, the simplicity of the judicial determination of the well-known trademarks; second, the standard to be a well-known trademark is easy to reach; third, the judicial determination of well-known trademarks has been used by many unscrupulous businessmen pursuing the maximum of profits. As the well-known trademark judicial determination system has flaws, unscrupulous businessmen can obtain well-known trademarks through judicial means. Self-admission system and negative status of judges in the lawsuit give a chance to the litigation fraud. The lack of responsibility of litigation fraud helps a lot to lower the cost when against the law. In 2009, the Supreme Peoples Court published a judicial interpretation on the well-known trademarks, to a certain extent, eased the situation of dissimilation of the well-known trademark judici