检察机的关自侦案件侦查制约机制的问题和完善.pdf

河北大学 硕士学位论文 检察机关自侦案件侦查制约机制的问题和完善 姓名：王小敏 申请学位级别：硕士 专业：法律硕士（法学） 指导教师：陈玉忠 2011-06 摘 要 摘 要 只有对权力实行监督和制衡,才能防止司法腐败。这是现代法治精神和诉讼理念的 要求。我国法律将自侦案件的侦查权赋予了检察机关，但对这一权力的监督制约问题却 无明文规定。自侦案件侦查权是人民检察院发挥其法律监督职能的重要手段，然而，正 是由于自侦案件侦查权的这种特殊性，长久以来备受“谁来监督监督者”的争议。在检 察机关自侦过程中刑讯逼供、徇私枉法等违法行为频频发生。随着我国司法改革的不断 推进，目前国内对自侦案件侦查工作实行了较为严格的监督制约机制，特别是检察机关 内部制约机制已较为完整，近年来，侦查人员违法违纪行为大为减少，执法水平和办案 质量都有很大提高。然而，不容置疑的是，自侦案件侦查制约机制从理论到实践仍存在 不少问题，有进一步完善的必要。有鉴于此，本文拟将通过研究首先分析自侦案件侦查 制约机制的制度设置现状，揭示自侦案件侦查制约机制存在的问题，最终提出相关的完 善对策。自侦案件侦查制约机制是保障检察机关自侦权正确行使的重要体系，对完善我 国社会主义法治，对促进社会和谐有重要意义。本文所进行的积极有益的探讨，希望能 够对规范自侦权的行使和改善司法现状有所裨益。 关键词：自侦案件 侦查制约机制 问题 完善对策 I Abstract Abstract Only the implementation of the supervision and the check and balance of power can prevent the judicatory corruption. This is required by the modern spirit of rule of law and the concept of litigation. Our laws endow procuratorial organs with the investigative power of self-investigation cases, but there is no express provision on the supervision and restriction of this power. The investigative power of self-investigation cases is an important means by which the Peoples Procuratorate can play its legal supervisory function, however, precisely because of this particularity, the investigative power of self-investigation cases has long been plagued by the controversy— “who watches the watchman ”. In the course of the self-investigation of procuratorial organs, illegalities such as torture and forced confessions