不同种植方案下软、硬组织稳定性的远期比较.docVIP

不同种植方案下软、硬组织稳定性的远期比较 　　[摘要] 目的 探讨前牙区不同种植方案修复后软、硬组织稳定性的差异。 方法 选取2012年1月～2013年1月于宁波市李惠利医院就诊并行牙齿种植的患者80例，种植体92颗，分为即刻种植组（30例，种植体36颗）和常规种植组（50例，种植体56颗）。修复后随访24个月，检查并比较两组种植体稳定性、种植体周围软组织情况和骨水平等。 结果 术后4个月和永久修复体戴入前，两组种植体稳定性系数值比较，差异均无统计学意义（P 0.05）。修复2年后，两组近中龈乳头平均增高、远中龈乳头平均增高、唇侧龈缘水平平均丧失情况比较，差异均无统计学意义（P 0.05）。修复2年后，两组近中侧和远中侧骨吸收比较，差异均无统计学意义（P 0.05）。 结论 前牙区即刻种植与常规种植均可获得良好的软、硬组织稳定性，但即刻修复具有疗程上的优势，对于适应人群应优先考虑。 中国论文网 /6/view-7215458.htm 　　[关键词] 即刻种植；常规种植；稳定性 　　[中图分类号] R782.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210（2016）01（c）-0126-04 　　Long-term comparison of stability of soft-tissue and hard tissue under different implant schemes 　　YANG Jun1 LIN Yong2▲ 　　1.Department of Stomatology， Ningbo Lihuili Hospital， Zhejiang Province， Ningbo 315041， China； 2.Department of Stomatology， Puyang Oilfield General Hospital， He’nan Province， Puyang 457001， China 　　[Abstract] Objective To investigate the stability of soft-tissue and hard-tissue after different implant schemes in front teeth area. Methods 80 cases of patients （implant of 92 teeth） underwent dental implant in Ningbo Lihuili Hospital from January 2012 to January 2013 were selected and divided into immediate implant group （30 cases， 36 teeth） and conventional implant group （50 cases， 56 teeth）， follow-up for 24 months. The implant stability， peri-implant soft tissue， bone level were detected and compared between the two groups. Results After 4 months surgery and before permanent prosthesis implant， there was no significant difference in implant stability coefficient between the two groups （P 0.05）. After repair of 2 years， there were no significant differences in the average increase of proximal mesial gingiva papilla， the average increase of distal mesial gingiva papilla， the average loss of lip side gingival margin level between the two groups （P 0.05）. After repair of 2 years， there were no significant differences in bone resorption of proximal gingiva mesial and distal gingiva mesial between the two groups （P 0.05）. Conclusion Immedia