01 what cn we learn about the earliest human lan.pdf.docVIP

01 what cn we learn about the earliest human lan.pdf.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
01 what cn we learn about the earliest human lan.pdf

First Proofs Monday, February 04 2008 1 5 What can we learn about the earliest human language by comparing languages known today? Lyle Campbell University of Canterbury, NZ 7 1 Introduction Looking back from modern languages, what can we find out about the earliest human language? The goal of this paper is to determine what, if anything, can be learned about the earliest human language(s) from evidence extant in modern and older attested languages. It evaluates attempts arrive at the origins of language through such comparisons. The main finding is negative: because of so much change over such a long time, nothing of the original language(s) survives in modern languages in any form that could be usefully compared across-linguistically to give any indication of the lexical or structural content of the original language(s). 2 Methodological issues A number of linguists have attempted to find deep genetic relationships, so-called ‘macrofamilies’, and some go even further, attempting to trace all human languages back to a single origin. ‘Global etymologies’ have been presented as evidence for ‘Proto-World’ (see Bengtson and Ruhlen 1994a, 1994b, Ruhlen 1987, 1994a, 1994b). Ruhlen’s homepage, ‘Proto-World’?1 is receiving considerable attention, and therefore it is important to scrutinize it carefully. I argue (see also Bender 1993, Hock 1993, Picard 1998, Rosenfelder 1999, Salmons 1992a, 1992b, Trask 1996:391–6, McWhorter 2001:287–303) 79 Is this correct date? First Proofs Monday, February 04 2008 80 Origin and Evolution of Languages that such a scrutiny reveals that claims about global etymologies are mistaken and cannot teach us anything about the origins of human language. Both friends and foes acknowledge that the principal method employed in global etymologies is ‘mass [or multilateral] comparison’ (cf. Ruhlen 1987:258). Ruhlen (1992:178) says, ‘John Bengtson and I, operating in a Greenbergian tradition of multilateral comparison, have proposed some thirty

文档评论(0)

canggu808866 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档