关于盔形器的几个问题.docVIP

关于盔形器的几个问题 张礼艳1 （吉林大学，文学院考古系，长春，130012） 摘要： 近年来鲁北地区盐业考古发掘和研究取得了重要进展，为进一步的研究提供了前提和基础，笔者仅就盔形器的来源和型式划分阐述个人的粗浅认识。 方辉先生认为“安阳殷墟文化中存在的圜底尊应是盔形器的祖形”，笔者认为，安阳殷墟出土的典型的圜底尊与鲁北地区出土的盔形器无论在外形、质地上都具有较大的差异，其用途也不尽相同。方辉先生文中所引据的安阳殷墟苗圃北地VDT4⑥：3VDT4⑥：3Some questions about KuiXingqi ZhangLiyan (Literature,Jilin university,Changchun,130012,China) Abstract: Recently, the archaeology of salt has acquired many developments, these provide premise and foundation for further study. In this article, the author will discuss about the origin and category of the KuiXingqi. FangHui thinks HuanDizun which founded in YinXu as the origin of the KuiXingqi, but I think they are very different in the aspect of shape, character and function. The VDT4⑥:3 is just a special case, because it is different from the others. It cann′t be taken as an evidence for the origin of KuiXingqi, moreover, it is an evidence for the spreading of KuiXingqi. The VDT4⑥:3 should be called “KuiXingqi”, it is very popular in the area of north ShanDong, and it has continuous evolution in this area. The late finding and studying have proved that the use age of the KuiXingqi is the late SHANG, this indicates that the KuiXingqi′s spreading to YinXu is possible. Meanwhile, I observed that the KuiXingqi which with round bottom are different from those with point in the whole, these differences are not because of evolution, but because of “type”. We can divide KuiXingqi into two type, they are also different in function and distribution. In one word, we can say that KuiXingqi is not origin from HuanDizun, it can be divided into two type, The VDT4⑥:3 should be called “KuiXingqi”, it is an evidence for the spreading of KuiXingqi, this indicates that YinXu and the area of north ShanDong have communication during the late SHANG. Key words: KuiXingqi；HuanDizun；round bottom ；point 随着山东北部地区商周时期盐业考古研究的开展，目前学界对于盔形器的用途、产地和使用时间已经有了较为明晰的认识：王青、朱继平根据出土盔形器的遗址的“地理分布和盔形器出土状态”，认为“鲁北地区盔形器存在两个不同的分布带，即沿海密集分布带和内陆少量分布带”。并采用XRF、XRD方法对盔形器内壁凝结物和文化层土样进行了物相分