新闻读后感50字.docVIP

新闻读后感50字 I happened to read the news about the cattle drugs could fuel climate change;I have been deeply astounded and shocked. As the study shows dung contaminated with the drugs released 1.8 times more methane. Isn’t it ridiculous? Dung is always an elementary part of our nature. It’s one part of biosphere’s circulatory system. How can it become a threat to our environment? The research suggests dosing farm animals with antibiotics increases greenhouse gas emissions from cow dung. It’s because the antibiotic change the microbes which inhabit dung beetles. Furthermore, antibiotic use on farms has unintended, cascading effects on the environment. Actually, the occurrence and development of all things on earth is in the process from quantity to quality. It’s reasonable that we let the farm animals take in drugs to keep off all kinds of diseases. However, I can’t understand why we make them overuse the drugs. If we have to, it is urgent for us to figure out the better ways to solve the digestible problemsof drugs. Everything will develop in the opposite direction when they become extreme. Nowadays, our environment is becoming more and more fragile. Therefore, we’d better put the environment onto the first place no matter what we do. Think twice before action. 篇二：新闻读后感 通讯点评 资料来源：《南方周末》2012-05-18 《尴尬的减法》 首先，该通讯的题目，很让人有耳目一新的感觉，让读者产生好奇心，充分调动了读者的兴趣，都想迫切了解一下什么是尴尬的减法。 该通讯的引言，用了强烈的数字对比的手法，“地震后，二万人表态认领，到今天仅十二名孤儿被收养”，强烈明显的对比不禁让人诧异，愕然。更让读者在心中打了一个大大的问号，不禁在心里问道：“这是怎么回事？”短短的几句话，就吸引住了读者的视线，勾住了读者的心，让读者想一睹为快，了解其中的内情。其中，“彼时有数万热心人士表达了自己的收养意愿。但4年过去，仅有1%的孤儿被收养 ”，“数万”与“1%”也形成鲜明对比。让人觉得有些许不解与心寒，正如引言所说的“618名孤儿，正和一起遭受了不幸的同伴，经历他们的独特青春。这个减法算式的答案，也许要等他们成年以后，才会获得”。 紧接着，作者用两道减法为我们揭开尴尬的真实原因：630-12=618。20000-12=？又采用了列举数字和对比的手法。 “630”，是汶川地震罹难者遗孤的数字。“12”，是过去四年间，630名孩子中被成功收养的数字。“618”，是现在生活在福利院、养老院以及和亲属生活在一起的地震孤儿的数字。“20000”是一个约数。是大地震后半个多月里，致电四川省民政厅“地震失散儿童收养咨询热线”，表达收养意愿的个人和家庭的数字。这个数字也一直在变化。地震后两个多月，这个数字变成了“数千”。四年之后，这个数字变成了零。“？”，就是这两组简单减法的答案所在。也是地震后国人慈善热情经历复杂嬗变的一个写照。当初的热心人士去哪了？618个孩子现在过得怎么样？ 作者分