网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

Archived Information for Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees (MS.ppt

Archived Information for Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees (MS.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Archived Information for Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees (MS

Archived Information Evaluation for 1st Year Grantees Shelly Potts, Ph.D. Arizona State University shelly.potts@asu.edu Developing an Evaluation Plan Key components What? How? When? Who? $? What does it mean? Who/what to tell? How used? Selecting evaluation tools methods What to consider? Types? Assessing outcomes Did we accomplish goals? How do we know? Recommendations Comprehensive Evaluation Plan Goals General aims or purposes Broad, long-range intended outcomes Written in broad, global language Used for planning and policy making. Include such statements as: “gain an understanding of,” “become aware of,” or “acquire the ability to.” Objectives Brief, clear statements that describe intended results Focused on specific types of behaviors participants are expected to demonstrate Must be attainable, measurable, and feasible. Include an action verb a statement of ability Types of Evaluation Measures Direct Standardized, local, course-embedded tests Review of student products paper, exhibit, project, design,program Structured evaluation of performance clinical/lab, simulation, presentation Portfolio assessment Review of project documents Indirect Surveys Interviews Focus groups Student evaluations Institutional data Grades, enrollment, participation, retention/persistence Selecting an Evaluation Method Match method with goal, objective Existing assessment? Reliability, validity Assess resources Timing Utility of data Triangulation of data sources Direct vs. indirect measures Matching Methods to Objectives Why use multiple methods? Ensure continuity of evaluation Increase confidence in findings Why use mixed methods? KNOWLEDGE GAIN Richest, most comprehensive description of participants, processes, outcomes Strengthen validity of findings/reduce methodological bias CREDIBILITY Conveyed “what,” “how,” “why” of experience outcomes Breadth and depth of participants’ experiences UTILITY Most complex, useful administrative resource Meet competing need

文档评论(0)

didala + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档