北京师范大学哲学与社科学院宗教学考博复试分数线.docVIP

北京师范大学哲学与社会科学院宗教学考博复试分数线 各位考研的同学们，大家好！我是才思的一名学员，现在已经顺利的考上北京师范大学，今天和大家分享一下这个专业的复试分数线，方便大家准备考博，希望给大家一定的帮助。 复试分数线： 专业代码及名称 外 国 语 业务课一 业务课二 总　　分 010101马克思主义哲学 45 60 60 010102中国哲学 45 60 60 010103外国哲学 45 60 60 010104逻辑学 45 60 60 010105伦理学 45 60 60 010106美学 45 60 60 010107宗教学 45 60 60 010108科学技术哲学 45 60 60 0101Z1科学思想史与科学社会史 45 60 60 030505思想政治教育 45 60 60 北京师范大学考博英语真题： Passage Three A “scientific” view of language was dominant among philosophers and linguists who affected to develop a scientific analysis of human thought and behavior in the early part of this century. Under the force of this view, it was perhaps inevitable that the art of rhetoric should pass from the status of being regarded as of questionable worth (because although it might be both a source of pleasure and a means to urge people to right action, it might also be a means to distort truth and a source of misguided action) to the status of being wholly condemned. If people are regarded only as machines guided by logic, as they were by these “scientific” thinkers, rhetoric is likely to be held in low regard; for the most obvious truth about rhetoric is that it speaks to the whole person. It presents its arguments first to the person as a rational being, because persuasive discourse, if honestly conceived, always has a basis in reasoning. Logical argument is the plot, as it were, of any speech or essay that is respectfully intended to persuade people. Yet it is a characterizing feature of rhetoric that it goes beyond this and appeals to the parts of our nature that are involved in feeling, desiring, acting, and suffering. It recalls relevant instances of the emotional reactions of people to circumstances—real or fictional—that are similar to our own circumstances. Such is the purpose of both historical accounts and fables in persuasive discourse： they indicate literally or symbolically how people may react emotionally, with hope or fear, to particular circumstances. A speech attem