《Emerald数据库检索与投稿指南.ppt

* * * * * * * * * * * * 摆正心态 在商业和管理领域至少有50%的稿件会被拒绝。每位作者至少都会有一次退稿经历。 询问原因 仔细倾听 大多数的编辑都会对退稿给出详细的意见，认真的倾听编辑的陈述。 再试一次 完善稿件，投给其它相关的目标期刊 被拒稿的积极因素： 得到鼓励，继续提高稿件质量 宝贵的投稿经历，更多了解系统流程 如果文章被拒绝 Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile . Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. 论文评审-如何修改你的论文？ 联系编辑，明确修改的期限 如果对评审意见有疑问，要同编辑确认你的理解是否正确 征求同事或合作者的意见，对要求修改的部分进行完善 保证在规定时间内完成修改 在修改稿前附一封信，逐条说明修改结果，如果没有修改也要说明理由 Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile . Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. Revision Notes Better grounding of the problem. Parts of the front-end of the paper read like a tutorial-like introduction of action research. In a rewrite, there are two things that I would like to see instead. I would expect a clearer attempt to establish the research-practice gap as an intellectual challenge. This is the main theme of the paper and it would therefore be useful to substantiate your understanding of this gap beyond the surface level. Next comment You imply that you do not wish to see a tutorial to CAR (even though one reviewer thinks that this is needed since some sections of the MISQ readership may not be familiar with CAR). We concur with you and have removed the tutorial aspects. The front end of the paper (pages 2-5) has been revised in order to outline the research and practical problems that we focused on. We agree that the research-practice gap needs to be positioned clearly as an intellectual challenge (as highlighted on page 3). We have now deliberately positioned the paper in this way with the challenge manifested in the action-research dichotomy, where either action or research tends to be the focus of action research projects (as explained on page 3). We also substantiate our arguments better in the broader CAR literature (as detailed from pages 5-14). Next response 1 2 3 Ref # Reviewer Comment Author Response Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile .