notes10 conductorsizinganexample（notes10 conductorsizing及实例）.docVIP

Effect of Bundling and Transposition on Series Inductance of Overhead Lines 1.0 Bundling The text, pp 64-65, considers a four conductor bundle in an equilateral configuration. We will consider a two-conductor bundle in an equilateral configuration, as shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 We assume: i1=i2=ia/2, i3=i4=ib/2, i5=i6=ic/2 r’k=r’ for k=1,…,6 Recall our eq. (31) which is the same as eq. 3.22 in the text: (31) Apply this to the configuration of Fig 1, for conductor #1. Bring ? into the logarithm. Define: Geometric Mean Radius (GMR) of bundle Rb=(r’d12)1/2 Geometric Mean Distance (GMD) between phase positions From phase a to phase b D1b=(d13d14)1/2 ≈(D2)1/2=D From phase a to phase c D1c=(d15d16)1/2 ≈(D2)1/2=D Substituting D into the last expression for λ1 (1) Factor out the ln(1/D): (2) Assuming balanced conditions, so that ib+ic=-ia, we have Use l=λ/i to get inductance of conductor 1: We can repeat the process for conductor 2, which is the other conductor in the phase a bundle. We will obtain: Since we have two equal conductors in parallel, the phase a inductance is just: Since we have an equilateral configuration of the phases, (3) Recall the solution to example 3.2 in the text where we had equilateral configuration but no bundling, i.e., only 1 conductor per phase. In this case, (4) Note that the only difference between the inductance expression for bundled (3) and non-bundled (4) equilateral configurations is the use of Rb for bundled case vs. the use of r’ for non-bundled case, where Rb=(r’d12)1/2. How does Rb related to r’? To answer this question, note that it will always be the case that the distance of separation between conductors in a bundle will exceed the radius of a conductor, i.e., d12r’ (Even Fig. 1, which is not drawn to scale, would suggest this). The implication of this fact on Rb=(r’d12)1/2 is that Rbr’. Therefore, D/RbD/r’. Therefore ln (D/Rb)ln (D/r’). Therefore the inductance of a bundled conducto