Does scale matter – costeffectiveness of agricultural农业规模问题农业的成本效益.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约5.74千字
约 18页
2017-02-13 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

Does scale matter – costeffectiveness of agricultural农业规模问题农业的成本效益.ppt

1、本文档共18页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Does scale matter? Cost-effectiveness of agricultural nutrient abatement when target level varies Antti Iho Presentation at the XIth EAAE Congress August 25 Cost-effectiveness in agri-environmental policy Most economic studies on pollution externalities focus on cost-effectiveness Political agendas often require it (e.g.WFD) A seemingly simple concept with many practical complications Our focus on target level variation’s implications on cost-effectiveness of agricultural nutrient reduction, phosphorus in particular Motivation: Biological characteristics make the need for agricultural nutrient load reduction often basin or even lake spesific Example: inland lake might be phosphorus or nitrogen sensitive under heavy or mild recreational use i.e. source of different economic benefits WFD requires cost-effectiveness of supplementary measures Assume many almost identical basins with a variety of reduction targets Can they benefit of each others cost-effectiveness assessments? What are the implications of ”scaling” cost-effective allocations? CE 1: one measure, two heterogenous parcels ___ =Buffer strip MAC for a gentle slope field ___ =Buffer strip MAC for a steep slope field Aggregate abatement: Ag+As, where Ag ≠ As CE 2: two measures, single parcel / n homogenous parcels ___ =Buffer strip MAC for all parcels ___ =Fertiliser reduction MAC for all parcels Aggregate abatement: Ab+Af, where Ab ≠ Af CE 2: two measures, single parcel / n homogenous parcels As the (marginal) abatement cost functions differ, each measure contribute to total abatement differently at its all levels CE 3: two measures, single parcel / n homogen. parcels, 2 constraints Aggregate abatement low constraint: AfL+AbL high constraint: AbH+ AfH The ratios of abatement per measure differ as target changes The aim To quantify this variation in abatement contributions and to answer: How severely is the cost-effectiveness property violated when abatement contribution ratios are used as guidel