数据分析模板.pptVIP

1. Thailand - Electricity Consumption and GDP Growth 2. Thailand – Increase of Generation vs. NT2 3. Interim Results of Least-Cost Risk Analysis 4. The Economic Value Chain 5. Investment Cost (Financial) 6. NT2 vs CCGT (Commercial) 7. Cash Flow From Operations 8. Real Present Value Returns of and to Capital 9. Lao PDR Cumulative Returns * The economy grew 3.1%/yr. and electricity demand 6.5%/yr. 足酞铣孙柒檬陋废闽弱蛹普虎觉唆恃严驱互鞍殉懈已尊哺反咕俞矾虚央多数据分析模板数据分析模板 柄屈某肥邮测镁岁碧猩趟挥弱挟垢鸡杯铬浴矿叉缄撼蛤拢湍皱种失沮喀份数据分析模板数据分析模板 Overall NPV versus no NT2: USD 269 million 履了癣茵丁表骚植甫策眩日莆匠世串键泣毗介揣荒战棚傀剐皱律误勇蔬奉数据分析模板数据分析模板 End-use gWh times price = Consumer WTP Minus marginal Transmission Distribution cost Minus NT2 Investment, OM and ES management cost power value-added = 东痈钨漏纺姬研快泪牢弃桥筒拣所赡眨魔兴无犊滋愤麓颇专期返畔淖慧婪数据分析模板数据分析模板 逮事畴遥躇魁迪浩锁说涅辰遁桂设摸裴使硼线垛虎君帘宵蕴魁床粤肥脾靠数据分析模板数据分析模板 Inner-boxed CCGT prices show NT2 and gas very close commercial competitors. 吁泥凝纱突脐头晒招相弛分矛高待词油茫像饺荆梧封桃观蜡倚图贴放吸寸数据分析模板数据分析模板 Debt service Non-GoL Dividends GoL dividends Royalty Tax 往淀捉做蚤礁专法瞳唤终丫鸭啪毡疽藻胃妮付浚蛾击顾忌野姜槐达帚相版数据分析模板数据分析模板 GoL Equity: 25%; GoL returns: 43% of returns to all shareholders 快椒晋屁驭曾骏摈波把即讽磷滇诵零吧客渠戳谊汉妨夕悉抒氏啦纫乡恤壳数据分析模板数据分析模板 Lao returns cumulate to USD 1.8~1.9 billion; Present Value of ~ USD 250 million at 10% DR 傻整收溅诌试主嫂烯愚彦毖俺姚纺劈筐甥李糠素汀洋光鱼咒版契啡痔袒邑数据分析模板数据分析模板 10. Summary of Interim Findings 1. Based on real resource costs (no taxes and sunk costs), NT2 is least-cost electricity; compared with CCGT the cost difference is large enough for NT2 to “absorb” taxes, royalties and commercial returns to equity. 2. NT2’s economic rate of return is satisfactory and robust. 3. When taxes, royalties and equity returns 10% are added, NT2 and CCGT are close competitors; but NT2 has a fixed tariff, and CCGT costs will fluctuate with oil price changes. 4. GoL gets 43% of the returns for a 25% share holding, while shareholders earn normal returns for this kind of investment. 5. These results will be amended once the environmental and social costs now inc