NetworkBased Denial of Service Attacks pentics基于网络的拒绝服务攻击pentics.net.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约5.13千字
约 16页
2017-03-08 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

NetworkBased Denial of Service Attacks pentics基于网络的拒绝服务攻击pentics.net.ppt

1、本文档共16页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

NetworkBased Denial of Service Attacks pentics基于网络的拒绝服务攻击pentics.net

Network-Based Denial of Service Attacks Trends, Descriptions, and How to Protect Your Network Craig A. Huegen chuegen@ Cisco Systems, Inc. NANOG 12 Interprovider Operations BOF Trends Significant increase in network-based DoS attacks over the last year Attackers’ growing accessibility to networks Growing number of organizations connected to networks Vulnerability Most networks have not implemented spoof prevention filters Very little protection currently implemented against attacks Profiles of Participants Tools of the Trade Anonymity Internet Relay Chat Cracked super-user account on well-connected enterprise network Super-user account on university residence hall network “Throw-away” PPP dial-up accounts Typical Victims IRC Users, Operators, and Servers Providers who eliminate troublesome users’ accounts Goals of Attacks Prevent another user from using network connection “Smurf” attacks, “pepsi” (UDP floods), ping floods Disable a host or service “Land”, “Teardrop”, “Bonk”, “Boink”, SYN flooding, “Ping of death” Traffic monitoring Sniffing “Smurfing” Very dangerous attack Network-based, fills access pipes Uses ICMP echo/reply packets with broadcast networks to multiply traffic Requires the ability to send spoofed packets Abuses “bounce-sites” to attack victims Traffic multiplied by a factor of 50 to 200 Low-bandwidth source can kill high-bandwidth connections Similar to ping flooding, UDP flooding but more dangerous due to traffic multiplication “Smurfing” (cont’d) “Smurfing” trend Smurf attacks are still “in style” for attackers Significant advances made in reducing the effects Education campaigns through the use of white paper and other education by NOCs has reduced the average “smurf” attack from 80 Mbits/sec to 5 Mbits/sec Most attacks can still inundate a T1 link “Land” Goal is to severely impair or disable a host or its IP stack Connects address and port pair to itself Requires the ability to spoof packet source addresses Requires the victim’s network