人性化护理对心血管内科住院患者生存质量及满意度的改善效果.docVIP

人性化护理对心血管内科住院患者生存质量及满意度的改善效果 　　[摘要]目的 探讨人性化护理对心血管内科住院患者生存质量及满意度的改善效果。方法 选取2015年1月～2016年1月我院心内科收治的144例患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组，各72例，对照组实施常规护理，观察组则实施人性化护理，采用生活质量综合评估问卷（GQOL-74）对两组患者的生存质量进行统计对比，并在干预结束后采用问卷调查了解两组患者的护理满意度。结果 干预前两组患者的GQOL-74评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P0.05），干预后两组患者的GQOL-74评分在认知功能、心理功能、躯体功能、社会功能方面比较，观察组显著优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）；观察组患者的护理满意度为98.61%，显著高于对照组的88.89%，差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 人性化护理模式更符合心血管内科住院患者的护理需求，能够从环境、心理、饮食、安全等方面入手全面改善患者的生存质量，提高患者的护理满意度，值得在临床上推广和应用。 　　[关键词]心血管内科；人性化护理；生存质量；护理满意度 　　[中图分类号] R473.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721（2016）08（a）-0174-03 　　[Abstract] Objective To explore the improvement effect of humanistic nursing on quality of life （QOL） and satisfaction in patients hospitalized in department of cardiovascular medicine.Methods From January 2015 to January 2016，144 inpatients hospitalized in our department were selected as research objects.By a random number table，they were evenly divided into observation group and control group.In the control group，conventional nursing was applied，while in the observation group，humanistic nursing was adopted.The QOL in the two groups was compared by GQOL-74，and nursing satisfaction was reflected by questionnaire survey after finishing the intervention.Results There was no difference in GQOL-74 score in the two groups before intervention （P0.05）.After intervention，there were statistical differences in cognitive function，mental function，physical performance，and social function with regard to GQOL-74 score，and differences in the observation group were superior to those in the control group with statistical significance （P0.05）.The nursing satisfaction in the observation group reached up to 98.61%，much higher than that of control group accounting for 88.89% with a statistical difference （P0.05）.Conclusion Humanistic nursing is more suitable for nursing demands in inpatients hospitalized in department of cardiovascular medicine，and comprehensively improves QOL in the aspects of environment，psychology，diet，and safety，as