- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
连续性肾脏替代治疗对ICU脓毒血症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效影响.doc
连续性肾脏替代治疗对ICU脓毒血症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效影响
【摘要】 目的:分析连续性肾脏替代治疗对ICU脓毒血症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效。方法:选取2011年1月-2014年12月于本院ICU住院治疗的脓毒血症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者58例作为研究对象,根据治疗方式的不同分为对照组与研究组。对照组给予常规药物护肾、维持内环境稳定等对症支持治疗,研究组采用连续肾脏替代治疗,比较两组APACHE Ⅱ评分、炎性指标、死亡情况、住院时间及生命体征。结果:两组治疗后APACHE Ⅱ评分均低于治疗前,且研究组治疗后APACHE Ⅱ评分低于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组平均ICU住院时间明显短于对照组,体温、心率、呼吸及平均动脉压均明显优于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:连续性肾脏替代治疗对ICU脓毒血症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效较好,患者免疫功能恢复更快,值得临床推广应用。
【关键词】 连续性肾脏替代; 脓毒血症; 急性呼吸窘迫综合征; ICU
【Abstract】 Objective:To analyze the effect of continuous renal replacement in patients with septicopyemia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICU.Method:58 patients with septicopyemia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in the ICU of our hospital from January 2011 to December 2014 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into the control group and the research group according to different treatment methods.The control group was given symptomatic supportive treatment,such as conventional medicine to protect the kidney and maintain internal environment stability,the research group was given continuous renal replacement.The APACHE Ⅱ score,inflammatory indicators,death status,hospital stays and vital signs were compared between the two groups.Result:After treatment,the APACHE Ⅱ scores of the two groups were all lower than those before treatment and the APACHE Ⅱ score of the research group was lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P0.05).The average ICU hospital stays of the research group was shorter than that of the control group,the body temperature,heart rate,breathing and mean arterial pressure of the research group were all better than those of the control group,the differences were all statistically significant(P0.05).Conclusion:The effect of continuous renal replacement in patients with septicopyemia and acute respiratory distress syndrome in ICU is better,patients’ immune function recovers faster.It is worthy of clinical promoti
文档评论(0)