国际犯罪论体系论文国际犯罪构成论体系研究.docVIP

国际犯罪论体系论文：国际犯罪构成论体系研究 【中文摘要】”国际犯罪论体系”是关于国际犯罪成立与形态的知识体系,“国际犯罪构成论体系”是关于国际犯罪成立的知识体系,后者是前者的核心与基础。刑法学的“犯罪论体系”,特别是“犯罪构成论体系”之争只能提供国际体系思考的知识论基础,但不能也不应直接进行国际转化。本文通过对“国际犯罪论体系”,特别是“国际犯罪构成论体系”进行学术发现、科学实证和学理提炼,以期实现学科互动,为体系之争提供全新视阈、输送可靠养分。本文采用整合研究的方法。首先,通过对国内外颇具代表性的国际刑法学理论著作进行学理考察发现,与之相关的命题付之阙如,且各种学说各自为政、混乱无序,其中较为有代表性的国外体系虽有合理基础,但设计不尽完善,国内体系接近国际实践,但基本问题尚不清晰、固??、合理,均很难发现学理层次较高的通说。于是,本文进一步对国际刑事法庭的规范进行规范考察发现,国际规范没有明显法系倾向,不等于、不能自动展示、也不能决定学理体系,而只能提供国际体系思考的法定要素。由此,发现国际活法模型并进行国际规范审视与学理比对,才是设计特定科学体系的可靠路径。最后,本文对国际刑事法院、前南斯拉夫刑事法庭、塞拉利昂特设法庭的经典裁决进行实证考察并进行体系建构。通过整合研究本文得出结论:“国际犯罪构成论体系”具有复合型和交错性,这是国际司法的“特定问题”决定了“特定体系”,不具有法系倾向性。本文的创新之处在于主要是运用“判例分析法”对“国际活法体系”进行科学实证而得出结论,可以为学理升华及日后的进一步深入研究奠定坚实的“司法理性”基础。 【英文摘要】There has long been a dispute about the system of constitution of crime theory which is the core of the system of the theory of crime or even the base of the total system of the school. What we have done until now is seriously limited to various comparisons among legal systems, lacking a brand-new international view. The creation of“the international system of the theory of crime”and“the international system of constitution of crime theory”can remove this great pity and benefit further study.The main method in this paper is integrated study. Firstly, the author studied some representative works of international criminal law and found that the relative doctrine was limited, and all sorts of theories are fragmented and disorganized. The representative system abroad although has reasonable basis, yet it is designed imperfectly; the domestic system is closed to international practice, but it is not clear, fixed and reasonable; both of foreign and domestic system lack dominant ideology. And then, the author studied the rules of some international criminal courts and found that the international rules can not equal, display or decide academic system, but provide legal elements for international system research. Thus, empirical research is