两种SPE净化方法在蔬菜农药多残留分析中的比较.pdfVIP

2010 年23 卷5 期 萄街农Jt学报 Vol23 No.5 Southwest China JournaJ of A伊cultural Sciences 1525 文章编号:1∞1 -4829(2010)05 -1525 -04 两种 SPE 净化方法在蔬菜农药多残留分析中的比较 猪能明，杨俊英\柴勇，徐利均，熊英，康月琼 (重庆市农科院质量标准检测技术研究所，农业部农产品质量安全监督检验测试中心(重庆) ，重庆 401329) 摘 要:采用气相色谱法测定了蔬菜中的农药残留量，研究比较了Florisil 柱和 GCB 氨基柱对供试样品基质的净化效果。结果表 明，GCB 氨基柱净化的样品添加回收率要略低于Florisil 柱，平均回收率为 76.2 % -112.6 % ， RSD 为 3.6 %句8.3 % ;Florisil 柱的 平均回收率为 82.5 % -1∞.8 % ， RSD 为 0.9 % -4.1 q岛;此外，本试验中Florisil 柱在去除背景干扰方面要优于GCB 氨基柱，而且 经济实惠。 关键词:净化; SPE; 农药残留:比较 中图分类号:S657.71 文献标识码:A Comparison of Two Kinds of SPE Clean-up Methods in Vegetable Pesticide Multi-residue Analysis .. CHU Neng-ming ,YANG Jun-ying. ,CHAI Yong ,XU Li-jun ,XIONG Yi吨， KANG Yue-qiong (Institution of Agri叫田al Qual町 Standard and Testing Technology ,Chongqing Academy of Agricultrual Sciences ,Center of Inspection 皿d Testing for Agricu1tura1 Products Quality and Saf，呵， Minis町 of Agriculture (Chongqing) ,Chongqing 401329 ,China) Abs仕act:币le pesticide multi-residu回 in vegetabl臼 W嗣 determir叫by gas chromatography to com阴阳 the p田面cation effect of the 阳市a col，阳回皿d GCB-amino column for 也e 皿mple matrix. The results showed 也况， the fi。而fied recoveries of 由e 困mple by GCB-田nino column was slighùy lower than that by the Fl。由il column , the 町erage recoveηwas67.8 % -112.6 % and RSD w皿1. 5 % - 6.2 0/0. The aver- age re∞V田y rate of the sample by !lorisil column was 74. 9 % -119.3 %皿d RSDw:国0.9 % - 5.5 %. In addition , Flori.sil ω，lumn had 8tronger ability of removing b配kground interleren四 than that of GCB-ar回m∞，lumn. K句 words:Cle皿-up; SPE; P，国ticide-residue; Compari田n 固相萃取(Soild Phase Extraction , SPE )作为前 力较强。 20 世纪80 年代人们才开始将GCB 开发成 固相萃取柱的填料，非常适合一些极性或中等极性 处理分离目标化合物手段，早