A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 英文参考文献.docVIP

下载本文档

5
0
约3.33万字
约 8页
2017-05-11 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 英文参考文献.doc

1、本文档共8页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 英文参考文献

ADescriptiveAnalysisofOverviewsofReviews Publishedbetween2000and2011 LisaHartling1,2*,AnnabrittChisholm1,DeniseThomson1,2,DonnaM.Dryden1 1AlbertaResearchCentreforHealthEvidence,DepartmentofPediatrics,UniversityofAlberta,Edmonton,Alberta,Canada,2CochraneChildHealthField,Departmentof Pediatrics,UniversityofAlberta,Edmonton,Alberta,Canada Abstract Background:Overviewsofsystematicreviewscompiledatafrommultiplesystematicreviews(SRs)andareanewmethod ofevidencesynthesis. Objectives:Todescribethemethodologicalapproachesinoverviewsofinterventions. Design:Descriptivestudy. Methods: We searched 4 databases from 2000 to July 2011; we handsearched Evidence-based Child Health: A Cochrane ReviewJournal.Wedefinedanoverviewasastudythat:statedaclearobjective;examinedanintervention;usedexplicit methodstoidentifySRs;collectedandsynthesizedoutcomedatafromtheSRs;andintendedtoincludeonlySRs.Wedid not restrict inclusion by populationcharacteristics (e.g., adultor children only). Tworesearchers independently screened studies and applied eligibility criteria. One researcher extracted data with verification by a second. We conducted a descriptiveanalysis. Results:From2,245citations,75overviewswereincluded.Thenumberofoverviewsincreasedfrom1in2000to14in2010. The interventions were pharmacological (n=20, 26.7%), non-pharmacological (n=26, 34.7%), or both (n=29, 38.7%). Inclusion criteria were clearly stated in 65 overviews. Thirty-three (44%) overviews searched at least 2 databases. The majorityreportedtheyearsanddatabasessearched(n=46,61%),andprovidedkeywords(n=58,77%).Thirty-nine(52%) overviews included Cochrane SRs only. Two reviewers independently screened and completed full text review in 29 overviews(39%).Methodsofdataextractionwerereportedin45(60%).Informationonqualityofindividualstudieswas extractedfromtheoriginalSRsin27(36%)overviews.QualityassessmentoftheSRswasperformedin28(37%)overviews; atleast9differenttoolswereused.Qualityofthebodyofevidencewasassessedin13(17%)overviews.Mostoverv