网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

哥本哈根上空的生态伦理学之争.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
哥本哈根上空的生态伦理学之争.doc

哥本哈根上空的生态伦理学之争   摘要:2009年12月哥本哈根气候谈判大会举行,关于人类与自然如何相处的生态伦理学之争也进入白热化阶段。人类中心主义和非人类中心主义是生态伦理学的两种基本观点。生态伦理学提出 “保护生态” 的道德要求 ,但在强硬的现实利益下,只有全面结合公共政策、国际关系、经Q济发展等因素才能解决中国目前的生态危机。   Abstract: Copenhagen conference was held in the General Assembly at December 2009. How to get along with humans and the natural ecological ethics became a question. Anthropocentric and non-human-centrism are two basic types of eco-ethics point of view, eco-ethics require that human should protect nature. We should consider public policy, international relations, economic development and other factors to solve Chinas current ecological crisis.   关键词:哥本哈根大会;生态伦理学;人类中心论;非人类中心论   Key words: Copenhagen general assembly;ecological ethics;anthropocentric;non-anthropcentric   中图分类号:B82-058文献标识码:A文章编号:1006-4311(2010)11-0005-02      The global ecological crisis is unavoidable challenges for countries. The situation is because the very survival of mankind serious threat to the World Climate Conference in Copenhagen was the convening of national political figures. The full name of the World Climate Conference in Copenhagen, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 15th Meeting of the Parties cum Kyoto Protocol 5th Meeting of the Parties.   1The special mission of the Copenhagen meeting   1.1 BackgroundThe Copenhagen meeting endeavored to pass the new Copenhagen Protocol to replace the Kyoto Protocol which will expire in 2012.If the negotiation failed, the world would not have a common document to restrain greenhouse gas emissions by 2012. Therefore, the issue has been given a great number of attentions. In this context, public opinions and political pressures that Chinese negotiating team faced reached the peak. Some developed countries want China to be away from other developing countries and share the same emission reduction commitment and obligation with developed countries.   1.2 MissionNature is not the purpose of human beings to achieve their own resources or tools, she has its ow

文档评论(0)

heroliuguan + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8073070133000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档