- 1、本文档共24页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
模版详解整理ppt
Paragraph 1 I always start begin with a broad statement about the issue at hand. For instance in an argument essay about whether it was necessary to conserve energy, I would begin with: Energy conservation has become a hot topic in the United States as of late. There are those who debate climate change and those who affirm it, those who assert that humans are depleting the worlds natural resources, including fossil fuels, and those who believe that humans are barely making a dent in consuming the resources the earth has to offer. This sets up a fluid introduction to my essay, and by starting with an introductory sentence, I felt I would set myself apart from the majority of other test takers who begin I agree or I disagree -- remember, you want to distinguish yourself from other essay writers (in a good way) right from the start. I always continue by saying, In the preceding statement, the author claims that (paraphrase of the authors argument). This shows that I understand the authors argument. I continue with my disagreement (and, as has been often said, ALWAYS disagree with the authors reasoning, and I pretty much always used the same thesis statement, something like: Though his claim may well have merit, the author presents a poorly reasoned argument, based on several questionable premises and assumptions, and based solely on the evidence the author offers, we cannot accept his argument as valid. I can use that statement for pretty much any argument essay I encounter. The beginning shows that I see the issue as nuanced, rather than black and white, and I recognize that though the author may have arrived at the correct answer, his reasoning is flawed. I also use we but I try to avoid using I. Take that as you will. Paragraph 2 For me, paragraph two always attacks the premises of the authors argument. I usually jot down a couple of premises on my board -- these are things that show up in the authors argument, usually without any evidence provided. So 99
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2022一级注册消防工程师继续教育人员密集场所消防安全管理题目和答案.doc
- 九省联考【安徽省】2024届高三物理试题及答案 .pdf VIP
- 毕业论文参考-基于ANSYS的连杆应力有限元分析及结构优化.docx VIP
- 北京市海淀区2025年中考数学一模试卷(含答案) .pdf VIP
- 初中数学第6章《实数》单元作业设计.pdf VIP
- 2025国家工业和信息化部所属事业单位招聘28人笔试备考试题及答案解析.docx
- 《无人机航飞与倾斜摄影测量入门与应用》考核试题及答案.docx
- 履带吊安拆监理细则.docx
- JC/T 547-2017 陶瓷砖胶粘剂.docx VIP
- 2025国家工业和信息化部所属事业单位招聘28人笔试备考题库及答案解析.docx
文档评论(0)