艾舍尔(国外英语资料).docVIP

艾舍尔(国外英语资料) Analytical philosophy: Paradox of the world picture, Escher Gallery. Network The natural sciences are said to tell us what the world is like and what the world has. The world described by science first is nature, and later it includes human beings and their brain activities. In addition, the boundaries of science are extended from nature to the social field, and the so-called social sciences have emerged. In the course of scientific development, professional differentiation and integration are almost at the same time. Most of the small and medium-sized scientists do a special job in a relatively small area, while a few large scientists do unified work. The result is unified provide a more complete picture of the exit in the world. The details of these pictures are perfected and supplemented by those small and medium scientists. But a picture of the world is a world view, which is usually said to be a philosophical work. Therefore, the work of those great scientists is naturally philosophical. So some people say that great scientists are often great philosophers. For example, general series living philosophers library where there Einstein roll. But in that case, what is the difference between a scientist and a philosopher? Is it true that all philosophers must first go in for science, and when science becomes too big, it becomes a philosopher, otherwise, it is impossible to engage in scientific philosophy and achieve nothing Such a conclusion comes from the premise that philosophy is a world view. If we give up such a premise, for example, philosophy is linguistic analysis, of course, we should not let philosophy sink into such an awkward position. This is the way of analytic philosophy. But philosophy has been engaged in the world outlook for thousands of years, and now it has been given up all the time, and the people are unwilling. So many great minds have been engaged for thousands of years, and all of a sudden they have been talking nonsense, and the