2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经-智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资 料 2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经-智课教育 智课教育2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经 4.在palm grove 买地 【本月原始】 作文是说，一个retail owner建议她的合伙人在P地买retail，因为比起D地，P地的real estate 价格过去5年一直在涨，所以在P地买会有interest。lz反驳：1.real est ate和retai不一样，前一个涨价后一个不一定涨2.过去涨现在不一定涨3. interest取决于价格和成本，P地购房成本也更高，不见得能有利润 【考古】 From GMAT AWA 最新题库 - 2010 The following appeared in a letter from apart-owner of a small retail clothing chain to her business partner: “Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then, that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So, it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights. 【参考思路】 1. 错误类比：S和P难以类比，地区之间必然存在差异，因为要考虑 经济、人口、交通等问题，不能单凭地价上涨与否判断哪个地方的地价 高，哪个地方更值得投资。 2. 因果关系-忽略他因：To increase financial interest不一定是因 为低价买到了一块地，还要考虑产品销量、交通便利、地区客流量等因 素。 3. 因果关系-错误因果：The claim that retail spaces in Sandide Heights are now overpriced does not necessarily proves that purchasing a retail space in Palm Grove can bring about financial interest. S的门店价格高不能说明在P投资就能赚钱。S的地价高，就一 定没有financial benifits吗?因为S的地价在上涨，这个反倒说明在S买 地能带来利益。为了更好地评价financial interest，我们还应该了解S 地门店价格的趋势 ，并比较两地的商业利益。 4. 无根据假设 ：The real estate price in Sadida Heights have risen while then prices in Palm Grove have remained unchanged is not sufficient to reach the conclusion that a retail space in Sandida Heights is not much more expensive than a similar in Plam Grove. 事实可能是S的原地价就比较低，而P的地价比较高，所以 虽然S的地价一直涨，但是还是比P的便宜。 5. 脑洞大开假设(谨慎参考)：因为价格低，所以在