实用理性—对中国传统文化“实践理性”误解的辩驳.docVIP

“实用理性”——对中国传统文化“实践理性”误解的辩驳 字数：3177来源：学理论·学术版?? ?? 2008年11期 ??字体：大 中 小??打印当页正文 参考文献： 　　[1]李泽厚.中国古代思想史论[M].人民出版社,1986. 　　[2]冯友兰著.中国哲学简史[M].赵复三译，新世界出版社,2004. 　　[3]陈来选编.中国哲学的精神——冯友兰集[M].上海文艺出版社,1998. 　　[4]赵汀阳.一个或所有问题[M].江西教育出版社,1998. 　　[5]陈明.儒者之维[M].北京大学出版社,2004. 　　[6]孔丘,孟轲著.论语、孟子[M].李杰主编，哈尔滨出版社,2003. 　　[7]李友生.儒家学说的实践理性[J]. 大庆社会学科, 1994（9）. 　　[8]葛晨虹.史论先秦儒学的实践理性[J].人民大学学报,1996(1). 　　[9]方国根,罗本琦.中国传统文化的“实践理性”及其当代价值[J].学术界(双月刊) , 2007(1). 　　[10]韩志伟.康德哲学中的实践概念[J].马克思主义与现实（双月刊） 2007(1). 　　 　　“Utility Sense”—— the Polemic to the Chinese Traditional Culture Practical Sense Misunderstanding 　　 　　Abstract:For the Chinese traditional culture, the theoretical field contain a kind of tendency with as to its practical sense of the Comte carry on explain, but the Chinese traditional culture has it the growth soil of the oneself, practical sense shortage with do a fitting annotation.This text works hard for to find out its ccurate define from the spread of the Chinese tradition culture accept, looking for the factor of utility sense from the Chinese tradition the formation background of the culture;Pass the annotation of contrast analysis utility sense, practical sense to Chinese tradition culture also, prove that utility sense is a Chinese tradition thought inspecial features personality. 　　Key words: Chinese traditional culture; utility sense; practical sense 　　（责任编辑/王丽君）