电针“调督任”为主治疗中风后抑郁的临床探究.pdfVIP

电针“调督任”为主治疗中风后抑郁的临床探究.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
电针“调督任”为主治疗中风后抑郁的临床探究

提 要 目的:观察电针“调督任”为主治疗中风后抑郁的临床疗效。 方法:本研究采用随机对照试验,将70 例合格的中风后抑郁障碍患者分为治疗 组和对照组各35 例。除接受常规治疗外,治疗组予“调督任”为主电针法和西药左 洛复治疗,对照组予左洛复治疗。分别记录两组患者于治疗前、治疗后2 周的 HAMD 量表评分,并计算两组的 HAMD 量表评分的减分率从而判定疗效;所得数据用 SPSS16.0 软件进行统计学分析。 结果:1.两组患者治疗前后HAMD 评分比较均有显著性差异(P0.05 ),提示 经治疗,两组患者抑郁症状均明显改善。2 .临床疗效评定:治疗组显效率为37.50% ; 对照组显效率为18.18%。3 .两组间HAMD 减分率比较有显著性差异(P0.05 ),表 明治疗组疗效优于对照组。 结论:电针“调督任”为主治疗中风后抑郁的临床疗效显著,值得在临床推广应 用。 关键词 电针;调督任;中风后抑郁;临床研究 Clinical Research on Electroacupuncture Therapy with Regulating Du and Ren Channels Primarily on Post Stroke Depression Speciality: Acupuncture and Moxibustion Author: Xu Ping Tutor: Liu Li’an Abstract Purpose: To observe the clinical curative effect of post stroke depression (PSD) with electroacupuncture treatment with regulating Du and Ren Channels primarily. Objection: According to randomized controlled trials, 70 patients who suffered from post stroke depression were equally divided into treatment group and comparative group. Besides basic therapy the treatment group was given drugs and electroacupuncture treatment with regulating Du and Ren Channels primarily while the comparative group was only given drugs. Two groups of patients were respectively evaluated by HAMD (24items) before treatment and 2 weeks after treatment. For curative effect, the HAMD scores of two groups were calculated to get deducted rates. The data was analyzed by software SPSS16.0. Results: 1.There are significant differences before and after treatment on both groups (P0.05). It’s suggesting that improving depressive symptoms in both groups patients with PSD have a better effect after therapy.2.Clinical curative effects show that the remarkable effective rate of the treatment group is 37.50% while the comparative group is 18

文档评论(0)

iludyapz + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档