Remedies for Breach of Contract UVic LSS（对违反合同的补救措施维多利亚大学LSS）.docVIP

下载本文档

85
0
约18.43万字
约 94页
2017-08-06 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

Remedies for Breach of Contract UVic LSS（对违反合同的补救措施维多利亚大学LSS）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Remedies for Breach of Contract UVic LSS（对违反合同的补救措施维多利亚大学LSS）

Remedies for Breach of Contract 8 Damages 8 The Three Categories of Damages 8 The Compensation Principle 8 Peevyhouse v. Garland (diminution in value, essential vs. incidental, deterrence against “windfalls”) 9 Radford v. De Froberville (essential vs. incidental, damages vs. equitable remedies, unjust enrichment) 9 Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd. v. Forsyth (economic waste, introduction of non-pecuniary damages, consumer surplus) 10 Victory Motors Ltd. v. Bayda (supply and demand and entitlement to expectation damages, precursor to mitigation) 10 Contract Law and Social Ordering 11 LAW AND ECONOMICS 11 Other Aspects of the Compensation Principle 11 Anglia Television Ltd. v. Reed (pre-contract expenditures, uncertain expectation damages) 12 Bowlay Logging v. Domtar Ltd. (reliance damages exceeding expectation damages) 12 Chaplin v. Hicks and Kinkel v. Hyman (chance of a profit is compensable) 12 Limits on the Award of Damages: Remoteness 13 Hadley v. Baxendale (reasonable foreseeability of loss) 13 Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd. v. Newman Industries Ltd. (application of reasonable foreseeability concept) 13 Implied Acceptance of Special Circumstances 14 General factors to consider in deciding whether damages are too remote 14 General purpose of limiting damages through remoteness 15 Special Problems and Circumstances 15 Jarvis v. Swan’s Tours Ltd (Contracts for pleasure, non-pecuniary damages) 15 Wilson v. Sooter Studios Ltd. (non-pecuniary damages for a peace of mind K) 16 Wharton v. Tom Harris Chevrolet Oldsmobile Ltd. (non-pecuniary damages, requirement of “sensory experience” discomfort) 16 Warrington v. Great-West Life Assurance Co. (contracts promising peace of mind, aggravated damages) 17 The Test to Employ to Find Non-Pecuniary Damages 18 Aggravated Damages (don’t use this term) and Employment Contracts 18 Punitive Damages 19 Limits of the Award of Damages: Mitigation 19 General Notes on Mitigation 20 Doctrine of Election: 21 Date of Assessment