中美法庭科学领域标准化工作比较研究.pdfVIP

刑事技术 2016 年 第41 卷 第1 期 ·综  述· DOI ：10.16467/j.1008-3650.2016.01.001 中美法庭科学领域标准化工作比较研究 花 锋， 周 红 （公安部物证鉴定中心，北京 100038） Comparison on Forensic Science Standardization Between China and the United States HUA Feng, ZHOU Hong( Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China) ABSTRACT: This paper provides an overview of the development and current situation of forensic science standardization in China and the United States. With inquisition into standardization management mechanism of the two countries, the comparison was made among the items of standard organization construction, standard formulation and revision, and standard application. Similarities of forensic science standardization were found such as their management mechanisms, which are both dominated by government departments. However, there are some differences existing on various aspects. The chinese standardization organization presents singleness but that of us diversified, meanwhile the standard review and approval procedure demonstrate the specificity of chinaʼs decentralization and usʼ centralization. Neither their voting regulations for forensic standards nor the focus of standard development is the same. In the United States, subcommittees are set up at a wider range of professional areas with more diversified and standardized membership forms and terms, and its committee meeting is more specific and operational with sufficient financial support. In order to ensure its quality and application, the formulation of standards, based on openness, concerns with more external factors which might affect the development of standards. The standards are set forth with more extensive source, more coexistent of transformati