各种挖掘机市场评价比较（Comparison of market evaluation of various excavators）.docVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约 9页
2017-09-07 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

各种挖掘机市场评价比较（Comparison of market evaluation of various excavators）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

各种挖掘机市场评价比较（Comparison of market evaluation of various excavators）

各种挖掘机市场评价比较（Comparison of market evaluation of various excavators） Brand: Carter, Komatsu. Carter price, durable. Drawback is that your accessories, not fuel-efficient Komatsu; energy saving and environmental protection, the quality is not better than Carter, but a lot better than the general brand, is also very obvious shortcomings, strength is small, not suitable for stone work. The second brand: Liebherr, Volvo, Keith. Keith and Liebherr are durable, good stability, but the price is high, the brand is not too loud; Volvo is very good, but after the acquisition of Samsung, the quality is getting worse, you are not recommended to use this brand, has the advantages of high visibility, the other Nothing is right. Three brand: Japanese, such as Kobelco, Hitachi, Sumitomo, Kato. These machines are of acceptable quality, fuel consumption is generally not high, but the stability is relatively low. Four brand: Korean, such as Doosan, hyundai. The price is low, suitable for engineering machinery has just entered this business with new. Although the stability is relatively low, but with the domestic machine more than words, it is still a big difference. The main selling point of low price. Five brand: domestic machine. This is not to do evaluation. Said the patriotic. In fact, Chinese, Carter and Komatsu have been rivals. Carter is the leader in the world, able to challenge Carters dominance, is certainly Komatsu. So I put Carter and Komatsu together. Carter oil consumption big, expensive machines accessories, high maintenance costs, in Chinese agents very big, this is not the place Komatsu. The advantages are: high strength, durable, cost-effective. Komatsu force smaller, stability is a bit poor, low durability. Has the advantages of saving, lower prices, good customer service in the Chinese. Komatsu and Carter are very good, in fact, just look at you for a. Sany excavator [31] the use of experience In March 17th 3.15, it is made of fire, is also a small excavator sales in