一审宣判后新发生的证据不属二审新证据（The new evidence after the judgment of the first instance does not belong to the new evidence in the second instance）.docVIP

下载本文档

13
0
约1.37万字
约 9页
2017-09-28 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

一审宣判后新发生的证据不属二审新证据（The new evidence after the judgment of the first instance does not belong to the new evidence in the second instance）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

一审宣判后新发生的证据不属二审新证据（The new evidence after the judgment of the first instance does not belong to the new evidence in the second instance）

一审宣判后新发生的证据不属二审新证据（The new evidence after the judgment of the first instance does not belong to the new evidence in the second instance） The new evidence after the judgment of the first instance does not belong to the new evidence in the second instance Author: Huang Dahu release time: 2010-07-05 09:23:39 [tips] The evidence appearing after the first instance is usually accompanied by new faces, but whether these evidence can become new evidence in second instance need to be carefully analyzed. In fact only when there is evidence of the fact that depends on the judgment of second instance to cover, as a new evidence to be adopted and the review process; otherwise, the evidence is not of the second instance of the new evidence, the court of second instance shall not be adopted, also cant be reversed. [case] Plaintiff Gou Mou and defendant Hemou partnership, borrowing 300 thousand yuan to chen. After the two sides of the partnership agreement: the loan from Hemou repayment. Later, Chen claims to no avail and will Gou, Hemou sued in a court, a court verdict half Gou, Hemou Chen were repaid the loan principal and interest and mutually liable. After the legally effective judgment, Gou fails to perform the obligations of the judgment of the situation by the partnership agreement dispute will Hemou prosecution to the court for an order B, Hemou pay a court judgment by Chen to repay the principal and interest of loans. Court B has failed to comply with the obligation of the court to determine the payment of the principal and interest of the loan, and does not have the obligation to repay the debt more than he should, and the court dismissed the plaintiffs claim. Gou refused to accept an appeal. During the trial of the second instance, Gou and Chen, third people in a company creditors agreed debt transfer agreement, a court verdict will meet Chen Gou loan principal half transfer from a company, paid by a company, so as to fulfill the obligation. Before the trial of the secon