寻衅滋事罪的司法认定——以宋某等人寻衅滋事案为例刑事诉讼法专业毕业论文.pdfVIP

寻衅滋事罪的司法认定——以宋某等人寻衅滋事案为例刑事诉讼法专业毕业论文.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
寻衅滋事罪的司法认定——以宋某等人寻衅滋事案为例刑事诉讼法专业毕业论文

Abstract As we all know, as an existing Criminal Code’s new charge, the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles is separated from the crime of hooliganism which is a charge in 1979 Criminal Law. It is an important performance improvement and progresses of China ’s criminal legislation. But in judicial practice identified for this crime still has many problems. In this paper, the author identifies the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles in depth analysis starting with a real case of C district in Chongqing. The paper is divided into five parts, and main content of the various parts are as follows: The first part is the cause of action. It is a case of Song et al stir-up-trouble. The second part is basic facts. In this part the author elaborates the case of Song et al stir-up-trouble in detail. In the third part, based on the case, the author generalizes, refines and lists the focus of the case which is how to punish the Song’s acts. In the fourth part, from the point of view of theoretical and judicial practice, the author refines the theory of Criminal Law researched. Account of the qualitative different opinions in the Song ’s case and their reasons clearly. The first opinion reputes that Song’s acts constitute the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles. The second opinion reputes that Song ’s acts constitute the crime of disturbed the social order. The third opinion reputes that they violate the crime of intentional destruction or damage of properties and the crime of willful and malicious injury (light damage), and they should be combined punishment for these two offenses. After that the work is recapitulation all reasons. The last part is arrival at a conclusion. In

文档评论(0)

sheppha + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5134022301000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档