- 1、本文档共38页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Which爓ay炉o爉ove
Which way to move:
The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese
Wenlei Shi / Yicheng Wu
Center for the Study of Language and Cognition,
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, P.R.China
Abstract: This article re-examines from an evolutionary perspective the typological status of Chinese,
with regard to the issue of how the information of motion events is encoded (Talmy 2000; Slobin
2004). We investigate, with emphasis on the roles of both language structure and language use, the
four periods of Chinese (Old, Middle, Pre-Modern and Modern) in terms of parameters such as PATH,
MANNER and GROUND, and compare with typologically different languages, namely, verb-framed
languages like Spanish and satellite-framed languages like English. Our statistical study shows that (i)
Chinese has been undergoing a typological shift from a verb-framed language to a satellite-framed
language, and Pre-Modern Chinese is a stepped-up period with respect to the speed of evolution; (ii)
Modern Chinese adopts diverse patterns to encode motion events, which are different from both
typical verb-framed languages and typical satellite-framed languages. We thus conclude that (i)
contrary to Peyraube’s (2006) claim, the typological shift in Chinese has not been achieved yet; (ii)
there is little justification for classifying Chinese as an equipollently-framed language as in Slobin
(2004) and Chen and Guo (2009), and accordingly, there is no need to posit an equipollent-type for
Chinese; and (iii) Modern Chinese is in a transitional state from V-type toward S-type in light of the
evolution of its motion expressions, and favours the side of S-type, considered from both
morphosyntactic properties and language use.
Keywords: motion event, lexicalization pattern, language
文档评论(0)