- 1、本文档共34页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Chapter III Methodology of the Research
3.1 Hypotheses
Nowadays, many English teachers in China still use traditional approaches in language teaching. The result is that many university students cannot use English appropriately although they have learned it for many years. They are structurally competent but communicatively incompetent, and many of them even cannot perform a simple communicative task. The main purpose of this study is to check whether college students’ communicative competence can be improved by organizing communicative activities in language teaching.
Two hypotheses are presented as follows:
1. Communicative approaches are more effective in developing students’ communicative competence in comparison with traditional approaches.
2. Students’ communicative competence can be enhanced greatly by organizing communicative activities in English teaching.
3.2 Subjects
3.2.1 Subjects in the Questionnaire Survey
In the questionnaire survey (see Appendix I), the students are selected from Qingdao Agricultural University majoring in secretary, horticulture and food quality and testing. All the students are freshmen in the second semester. The average age of them is 19, and 40% of them are male while the rest 60% are female.
3.2.2 Subjects in the Experimental Study
The subjects of the experiment come from Qingdao Agricultural University. In order to avoid the differences caused by different teaching styles and teaching results, the author select two classes (N=84) majoring in horticulture, whom are instructed by the same teacher. The students are freshmen in the second semester. The number of students in each class is 42. The two classes are divided according to their scores for National College Entrance Examination so that their English level is roughly equal. Class 1 is an experimental class in which the teacher uses communicative approaches and organizes many effective communicative activities in class, and class 2 is a control class in which the teache
文档评论(0)