互联网企业拒绝交易的反垄断规制分析Internet companies refused to trade analysis of antitrust regulations.pdfVIP

Abstract In recent years, there was constant trouble because some Internet companies refuse to trade at home and abroad , these disputes ’harm is not only Internet industry but also the economic growth. So it is necessary that we should bring anti - monopoly regulation into force. Article 17 and Article 55 of Chinese Anti - monopoly Law is main statutory authority for those companies. However, the above regulations are rigid principles and poor maneuverability. Besides, it is not specifically for Internet companies refuse to trade, therefore some rules of this law have shortcomings. The Anti - monopoly Law and associated configuration is not faulty and the relevant standards also are foggy, all this tended to lose safeguard in the rule of fair Internet marketing. China should be based on European Union and some other countries ’experience about refusing to trade. The article a logical train of thought is:”the reason why Anti - monopoly Law restricts some Internet companies refuse to trade→How to be considered as this behavior→how to decide that is illegal→what regulatory duties Internet companies should undertake.” The text also uses some methods, such as conclusion 、Comparative studies、systems analysis and so on. The text has four parts: Part I: the reason why Anti - monopoly Law restricts some Internet companies refuse to trade. The principal reason for meeting with resistance is that causes serious danger to economy. First, this behavior sets up barriers for other goods want to enter the market; it is restraining competition and breaking up the fair play order. Secondly, this behavior makes economy run Internet to be restricted, and it aims at small and medium Enterprise Net