海商法实务与案例分析课().ppt

;海上货物运输案件;解决海上货物运输案件的国际商务背景常识;;;无单放货案件;无单放货的”单“指什么？;什么是无单放货？;一起典型的无单放货案件（“厂丝案”）;首先解决诉谁的问题 whom to sue?;“厂丝案”中的索赔理由;无单放货的违约责任及对占有的侵害;无单放货的民事责任;无单放货情况下的免责和责任限制;案例讨论;无单放货后提单持有人救济权利的丧失;无单放货后提单持有人和受害人的救济;Do I have the right to sue?; ;无单放货案件中承运人的免责问题;记名提单是否需要凭单放货？（最高院案例）;倒签提单;倒签提单给进口方造成的严重的损害后果;厦门中贸进出口有限公司（进口方/开证申请人）;买方;对国内进口方的建议;货损货差索赔案;收货人/提单持有人;“三江口”轮货损、货差纠纷案;海事法院判决认为：;在货损货差案举证责任中的三个“球”;第一轮，索赔方举证证明： 第一，货物发生了灭失或者损坏； 第二，该灭失或者损坏是发生在承运人的责任期间的。 第二轮，承运人举证证明： 船舶在开航前和开航当时是适航行的（即首先证明其已经履行“谨慎处理”的义务，使船舶适航，或证明不适航与货损没有因果关系）。 第三轮，索赔方举证证明： 货损不是免责事项所致，而是管货过失引起的。; ;请看Hague/Visby Rules中的原文规定：;Article 4 1.Neither the carrier nor the ship shall be liable for loss or damage arising or resulting from unseaworthiness unless caused by want of due diligence on the part of the carrier to make the ship seaworthy, and to secure that the ship is properly manned, equipped and supplied, and to make holds, refrigerating and cool chambers and all other parts of the ship in which goods are carried fit and safe for their reception, carriage and preservation in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 3. whenever loss or damage has resulted from unseaworthiness the burden of proving the exercise of due diligence shall be on the carrier or other person claiming exemption under this article.;保险人;案例八;原告律师理由：;原、被告双方的博弈：;2.Neither the carrier nor the ship shall be responsible for loss or damage arising or resulting from (a) Act,neglect, or default of the master, mariner,pilot, or the servants of the carrier in the navigation or in the management of the ship. (b) Fire, unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier; . (q)Any other cause arising without the actual fault or privity of the carrier, or without the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burdern of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier not the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carri