- 1、本文档共24页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
早朝大明宫
靜宜中文學報 第五期
2014 年06 月 頁35-58
靜宜大學中國文學系
從唐代「和詩」體制論王維等四人所作
〈早朝大明宮〉詩之優劣
王家琪*
摘要
清․趙殿成所注《王右丞集笺注》,集中載有許多王維與同朝詩人的同題
唱和詩作。其中七律〈和賈舍人早朝大明宮之作〉一首,是在賈至首唱之後,
王維、岑參、杜甫接著唱和,不但形成唱和詩之典範,更受到歷來諸多詩評
家的關愛注目並與對其進行品第排名。到底是基於後代讀者之愛尚,而各有
擁護支持者?抑或是賈、王、岑 、杜四人之所作真有高下之別?而「和詩」
之特徵究竟為何?什麼樣的「和」法才算好的唱和之作?
本文先從宋、明詩話評論家論述賈、王、岑、杜四人所作之相關評論,
看宋、明詩評家對四人詩作之接受態度;再試著從唐代對「和詩」體制之要
求與規範,檢視四人所作,為「和詩」之品評找尋一理論依據。
關鍵詞 :和詩、王維、接受視域
*
台北海洋技術學院助理教授。
35
Journal of Chinese Literature of Providence University
Vol. 5, Jun 2014, pp.35-58
Chinese Literature Department, Providence University
To comment the pros and cons of The Pilgrimage to Daming
Palace by Wang Wei and three other poets from the Tangs “write
and reply in poems”system
*
Wang Chia-Chi(王家琪)
Abstract
The compiler Zhao Diancheng s book Annotations of Wang You Cheng
,contained many of Wang Wei s “write and reply in poems” with meanwhile
poets. One of poem The Pilgrimage to Daming Palace, Jia chih wrote it
first ,then, Wang Wei 、Cen Sen 、Du Fu wrote it second. This group of poems not
only a model of the formation of “write and reply in poems”, Poetry has always
been a lot more by critics attention and care products with its first rankings. Is it
based on the descendants of readers still love, and support each supporter? Or
One of them is writing better then the other? What are its characteristics of
write and reply in poems ? What kind of write and reply in poems is the
best ?
This article discourses the opinions of Song 、Ming Poetry critic first,then
dis
文档评论(0)