NOTE The responses to question 69 contains explicit reference to SCI注意回答问题69包含SCI引用.doc

下载文档 降价啦

1
0
约34.32万字
约 119页
2018-03-26 发布于江西
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

NOTE The responses to question 69 contains explicit reference to SCI注意回答问题69包含SCI引用.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

ANNEX I-3 COMMENTS BY ARGENTINA ON THE REPLIES BY THE SCIENTIFIC EXPERTS TO THE QUESTIONS POSED BY THE PANEL 31 JANUARY 2005 COMMENT ON REPLIES TO QUESTIONS BY DR. ANDOW Question 3 3. On the basis of the information before the Panel, is there any scientific evidence to support the hypothesis that wide-spread cultivation of Bt crops such as biotech maize of the Bt variety adversely affects non-target organisms which may be exposed to such crops under typical agricultural practice? (See, inter alia, EC-149, EC-150, EC-151, EC-152) If so, how does this risk compare with risks to non-target organisms arising from non-biotech applications for Bt toxins (i.e., the use of Bt toxin as an insecticide in conventional and organic farming)? What risk management options are available to mitigate any resulting risks and what is their efficacy? Scientific evidence 03.01. In the answer to this question, I will concentrate on Bt maize and Bt cotton. Yes. there is some scientific evidence to support the hypothesis that wide-spread cultivation of Bt crops adversely affects non-target organisms which may be exposed to such crops under typical agricultural practice. However, this evidence is insufficient to establish the hypothesis that such adverse effects are expected to occur. Comments by Argentina This statement starts mentioning that there is some (sic) scientific evidence to support the hypothesis…, of non-target effects on organisms, which may be exposed, and ends that this evidence (sic) is insufficient to establish the hypothesis that such adverse are expected to occur. It is clear from this wording that there is no solid evidence to support the fact that the organisms will actually be exposed in a way which may be of concern about the safety of the Bt crops mentioned. 03.02. The review of non-target effects of Bt plants in EC-149 covered 13 laboratory studies evaluating potential hazard, and 14 field studies aimed at evaluating potential risk. Of the 13 lab studies r