诗言志论文陆机诗歌情感研究.docVIP

诗言志论文：陆机诗歌情感研究 【中文摘要】陆机在《文赋》中明确提出了“诗缘情而绮靡”的创作理论,结果其诗歌却被后代诗论家目为“不及情”或者“感情贫乏”,这一矛盾现象很值得深究。“诗缘情”与陆机诗歌情感的互证研究,还有继续深入开掘的空间和意义,而且尚没有引起学界的普遍关注和重视。正是基于这个意义和考虑,本文才不揣浅陋,拟用知人论世、文史互证和创作心理学等研究方法,从“诗缘情”与陆机诗歌创作的互证的角度,希冀对陆机诗歌的情感类型、特征和情感表现之得失做一个“持而未周”的尝试性研究。本文共分为五个部分:第一部分为绪论。在比较全面地了解20世纪至21世纪初十年,国内外研究陆机及其文学创作的基本概况后,确定本文的研究论题和研究方法。第一章,“诗言志”到“诗缘情”的嬗变。分别阐述“诗言志”和“诗缘情”两大理论的提出背景和丰富内涵,以及历代对于“志”与“情”的辨析,探讨个体情感(“诗缘情”)对于诗教传统(“诗言志”)的疏离。第二章,“缘情”理论与创作实践的统一。本章主要结合陆机的诗歌作品分析其诗歌中所表现的丰富情感和体现的鲜明特征,论证陆机诗歌是“及情”之作。第三章,“缘情”的追求与困境。本章重点从专重形式美的时代审美风尚的习染和西晋“政失准的”的特殊环境与入洛处境对陆机诗歌情感的约束和限制两个视角,析论陆机诗歌情感表现的得失,从而廓清历代论者评定陆机诗歌“少情”、“不及情”的迷雾。第五部分为余论:“言志”标准与“缘情”实践的分歧。通过考索探微历代论者的评价立场和标准,辨析历代论者对“诗缘情”与陆机诗歌的情感评价,认为陆机诗歌“少情”甚至“不及情”的大多数论者多是以“诗言志”的教化标准看待陆机的“诗缘情”理论下的诗歌作品,所以导致了评价的偏颇以至错误,从而进一步补正了陆机诗歌是“诗缘情”理论下的“及情”之作。 【英文摘要】Lu Ji, “Wen Fu” clearly put forward the “Profusion Lyric Poetry,” the creation theory, the results of his poems been generations of poetry project for the “less love” or “feeling poor”, the paradox is worth get to the bottom. “Lyric Poetry” and Lu Mutual Proof of the emotion of poems, as well as to continue to dig deep space and meaning, and there was no widespread concern among scholars and attention. It is in this sense and consideration, this is not only hides shallow, intended Reflection of Life, Literature, writing each card and psychology research methods, from the “Lyric Poetry” Poetry and Lu point of each card, in the hope of the land emotional type of machine poetry, performance characteristics and emotional pros and cons to make a “hold without week” trying to study.This paper is divided into four parts:The first part is an introduction. In a more comprehensive understanding of the early 20th century to the 21st century, decade, domestic and foreign research literature Lu and the basic situation, the subject of this study identified and research methods.ChapterⅠ, “Poems” to “Lyric Poetry” Evolution. Were elaborated, “Poems” and “Lyric Poetry” two of the Theory of background and rich content, and ages for